Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

Your Chinese Lawyer. Trust Yet Verify?

Posted in Legal News

Got an email recently from someone who had contacted me months ago regarding a potential litigation matter against a Chinese company. The case was not terribly complicated and so I recommended this person secure local Chinese counsel, particularly since he spoke Mandarin.  The new email was an update and the news was not good.

Seems this person is convinced that his local Chinese attorney passed on secrets to the Chinese company he intended to sue. I cannot say whether this is true or not, but I can tell you this is at least the third time I have become aware of something similar and I have never heard a story like this involving an American lawyer.  The other two instances involved American companies that had retained Chinese law firms for their trademark applications, only to have those (two different) law firms take forever to file for their trademarks and then report back that a Chinese competitor company had — in the meantime — beaten the American companies to the trademarks.  Both companies were convinced (as was I) that their law firm had given an advance tip-off to their Chinese competitors and, no doubt, gotten paid nicely for having done so.

My firm has never experienced this problem with a Chinese lawyer, but I have experienced it with a Korean lawyer (it was actually in favor of my client in that instance) and I wrote about it in a post, entitled, “China Lawyer Ethics — Perils And Pitfalls For Foreign Companies:”

Many years ago, I was meeting with the in-house international legal counsel for a very large Korean company, or chaebol. I was there representing the chaebol on one case, but the in-house counsel wanted to use our meeting as an opportunity to “pick my brain” about a fairly small, but somewhat complicated, multi-party case on which he was working. The case involved an alleged breach of contract and a number of American high tech companies. The case was pending in a Korean court and settlement talks had just begun. The in-house lawyer spent maybe ten minutes explaining the facts of the case and the various players to me and once I had reached a point where I felt I understood its overall outline, he handed me a two page letter to review.

The letter was written by an American attorney, on behalf of his American client, to the Korean lawyer representing the American company in Korea. The letter talked about how the American company wanted to settle the case for a million dollars, but they would be willing to take $600,000. The letter then instructed the Korean attorney to start settlement negotiations at $1.4 million.

Seeing as how my client had a copy of this letter, I initially assumed the American company whose settlement strategy was revealed in the letter was on the same side in the Korean case as was my Korean client, and I read the letter accordingly. I then read the letter again and then read it a third time. I was really confused and I had to confess as much to the Korean in-house lawyer. I told him I had thought the American company whose settlement strategies were being discussed was the American company suing the chaebol, but I obviously must have misunderstood the facts. The Korean in-house lawyer (who had an American legal degree) smiled and then explained.

The American company in the letter was on the opposite side of the chaebol and the letter setting forth the innermost workings of its settlement strategy directly involved its efforts to settle with the chaebol. My Korean client had been given this letter by the Korean attorney who was suing the chaebol on behalf of the American company, because this Korean lawyer had attended the same Korean law school as the in-house lawyer and had started law school a year or two later, making the in-house Korean lawyer his “big brother.” The opposing Korean lawyer would golf once or twice a year with the in-house Korean lawyer and had been trying to secure legal work from the chaebol for some time.

I went on to explain how we deal with this lack of a confidentiality guarantee:

I was young at the time and I was naive and I was appalled and I expressed my disbelief. The Korean lawyer laughed and explained to me that this was par for the course in Korea. To this day, I have no idea if this was or is really par for the course in Korea, but I have always acted as though it is, and I have always acted accordingly.

One of the ways I have handled this is by consistently using the same few lawyers in Korea for all of my firm’s clients. My thinking is that our providing so much work to these lawyers does two things. First, it creates a personal relationship between me and them and thus makes it that much more difficult for them to turn around and hurt me by hurting my client. Second, it takes away much of the incentive for the Korean lawyer to hurt my client because the Korean lawyer knows that if he (Korean lawyers are almost invariably men) does so, the regular stream of work my firm provides him will dry up. The way I see it, the foreign client who goes directly to the Korean lawyer in a one-off relationship is at far greater risk of a breached confidence. Despite all this, I am still far more circumspect in dealing with Korean lawyers who I use as local counsel than I would be in dealing with an American lawyer in Topeka.

The other way I handle this is to use American lawyers in Korea, of which I know many. I figure there is almost no way an American lawyer would risk his or her law license by engaging in such tactics.

We have done the same thing in China by choosing to work with only one or two Chinese law firms in each city so as to build up strong relationships and mutual trust.

Bottom Line: We are absolutely NOT saying all Chinese lawyers will violate your confidences because that is far from being true. But we are saying that you shoud not hire anyone as your lawyer in China unless and until you are sure you can trust them, because maybe you cannot.

  • Melvyn S.

    Until reading this, I did not realize this happened to me, but now I am convinced of it.  We were planning on using our relatively well known company name on a product for sale in China and we hired a law firm recommended to us by our Chinese distributer.  Our distributer was upfront about how the law firm was run by his cousin but he convinced us that they were good and I have no reason even today to think otherwise. We hired them after they said our name was still available but when they actually filed only three weeks later, it had been taken. I always thought that was strange but now I think I know what happened.  Do you think I should sue?  

    • http://www.chinalawblog.com/ Dan Harris

      Apprive

      • Victor

        I am a Chinese lawyer, I am not here to argue for all the Chinese lawyers, but I have to argue for myself.  Some Chinese lawyers indeed only care of their own interests, but more and more Chinese young lawyers, particularly those who graduated from law schools in the U.S. or E.U. have the same standard of Ethics.

    • Victor

      When a company name is relatively well known, it must register it as its trademark as soon as possible because thousands copycats would do it if you do not it in time.  I am sorry to hear your company name has been registered by others, but we could not simply make a conclusion that is the lawyer’s fault.  We still could find out a way to solve this problem.  

  • Mrkrullebol

    This good advice.  It is not an understatement to say that Chinese don’t trust each other.   They don’t. They can’t.   (That is why they have guanxi:  To overcome the distrust, if possible.)  Chinese lawyers are not different.  ”Conflict of interest?”  They have never heard of such a thing.  The only time they will not breach it is when it is not in their interest to do so.  They have only one interest:  Their own.

  • Mark Cohen

    Dan, great post.  I wish I had this post to cite to for my forthcoming article in the Fordham Law Review “International Law Firms in China: Market Access and Ethical Risks”.  Choosing and keeping a Chinese or foreign lawyer in China is hardly a mechanical task. 

  • Frankie Leung

     I have known from a bank client in China that once a chinese corporate client’s lawyer offered to disclose the hidden assets of his client for a fee from the bank which was tracing this chinese corporation’s assets.  As a precaution, in my practice, it is advisable to use a western firm to liaise with a chinese law firm which is hired to do work in China to ensure what can be given and what not to the chinese law firm.  Chinese lawyers still operate under the ethical concept their primary obligation to the state and secondary to the client.  In addition, some of the chinese lawyers do not have an ethical concept on conflict of interest.

  • http://en.doroto.com/ Jason Tian

    Dan, I just came across this article. Though I feel a bit stung by the information conveyed to readers, I will not argue for or defend the Chinese legal community. I have to admit that Chinese legal community is relatively young and not sophysiticated enough. the concept of “conflict of interest” is pretty new to chinesel lawyers working without much exposure to international practice. I myself was quite impressed when the Belgium lawyer I inquired about a contemplated arbitration enforcement initiated to check out the conflict of interest inssue. I myself was requested to chekc out the issue of confilict of interest by a New Zealand lawyer when he inquired me about possible representation of his client in China. But the Chinese lawyers are growing mature with the help of people like you who bring the high-standard performance and ethics into China.

    Further I want to point out that some of the comments are outdated or wrong such as “Chinese lawyers still operate under the ethical concept their primary obligation to the state and secondary to the client”, which is not really the case. If you keep close eyes about the legal landscape in China, Chinese lawyers have more and more played an active role in advancing the rule of law in China.

    Without solid evidences of proving the alleged breach of professional ethics, the idea in your article is easily bought by western people in part because of the natural lack of understanding of two people or cultural difference. This is not going to be resolved any time soon.

    Of course, I am happy that you did emphasize that “We are absolutely NOT saying all Chinese lawyers will violate your confidences because that is far from being true”.