Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

What Does China Want?

Posted in Recommended Reading

Must-read article by The Christian Science Monitor’s Beijing correspondent, Peter Ford. The article is entitled, “Rise of an economic superpower: What does China want?” I liked the article because it does a very good job explaining where China fits in the world right now, where it sees itself fitting, and where it is going. I particularly liked how it concludes that China’s future role is uncertain and how it does not jump on the “China will rule the world” bandwagon. The article rightly concludes that China, right now at least, has very little influence in the world beyond economics and even that mostly stems from its internal growth, not from Chinese multinationals, of which there are hardly any.

It also contained a quote that is very relevant for business:

Nor, frankly, do foreign affairs seem to figure very high on Chinese leaders’ agendas. “International questions are an afterthought,” says Francois Godement, founder of the Asia Centre, a Paris-based think tank. Instead, for a Communist Party whose overriding priority is to stay in power, domestic problems threatening social stability at home are infinitely more important.

This is absolutely true.

Far too often when my firm’s clients have problems in China or hit roadblocks, they start talking in terms of how we should be pressuring the Chinese government because what they are doing is “not going to make it look good in the world.” My response is usually something pretty blunt, along the lines of, “China does not really care very much about how it looks in the world; It’s most important constituency is its own citizens and by keeping you out of X, Y and Z, it is looking pretty good to them right now.”

What do you think?

  • Bob Walsh

    Perhaps only Earl Butz, Nixon & Ford’s Secretary of Agriculture, might be able to answer that question with any degree of accuracy & insight.

  • Tim

    Absolutely agree. I often find myself discussing this very same issue with my clients as well. Beijing’s first priority is maintaining its power; most other issues are going to be secondary to this – including the law. When you start talking about local priorities, however, this is not true as local needs are not always in line with National interests.
    One of the myths that this blog has debunked before: there is a unified monolithic Chinese government.

  • Anon

    “This is absolutely true.”
    Not so sure about that…

  • PWM

    China wants to bring its poor people into the middle class and get its rich people even richer.

  • greg

    Consider China as the nineteenth century US: a booming economy of continental size that wants to be left alone.
    But China is not exactly the nineteenth century US because its growth and development have both benefited from and been complicated by the global environment.

  • DaMn

    My first reaction half way through around “Nor, frankly, do foreign affairs seem to figure very high on Chinese leaders’ agendas.” is…thank God! We have far too many idiots roaming the earth with agendas that frankly are self serving and do damage. Oh ut they are “experts” yada yada yada. Once you get to the top of a “world” organizations hierachy you have a very limited agenda that has a lot of sacrifices, for other people.
    Upon reflection though, I find it utterly ignorant of “recent developments.” China is working parallel agendas. One the one side domestic and on the other international. The proportion used to be 95% to 5%. Now it is defeinitely on the map with 80% and 20% and that 20% is not talking. Its action.

  • Seth

    I just read the whole article. We all know that China is not playing by the rules, but who says that Western countries do? Look what happened to Gaddafi. Instead of the Western governments pressing the new Libyan government to provide a fair trial, they actually let the crowd kill him and his family as dogs. His female bodyguards were captured and raped God knows how many times before they were killed and no one from the West had anything to say about that. Come on, do Western countries have right to preach anyone about breaking the rules when they illegally attacked Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and now preparing to the same with Iran or Syria? I don’t think so.

  • (Actos) attorney

    Completely agree!

  • Dan (another Dan)

    Well, I hope in the pursue of maintaining power, that the authorities’ (local or national) can do something about the solving environmental issues. That is a topic that affects everyone. Young or old and rich and poor. Local and on the national level. No amount of wealth, Iron fists and turning a blind eye can make up for the consequences of that issue.
    There’s only two realistic options out that. One is to alter the life styles, and the other is to upgrade technology to make it more environmentally compatible. When I say alter and upgrade, I meant it more on the terms of being revolutionary, because the life styles of the developed nations are not at all sustainable. Also, the international S&E (Scientific and Engineering) community don’t actually have a lot of “applicable” solutions or theories as of yet. The people in China are going to have to be intensely creative and need an open mind in dealing with this problem.
    So, if the authorities are really serious about their goal of maintaining rule, eventually they will have to be serious about their relationship with nature.

  • Elemental

    I would split this question into asking what the Chinese people want and what the Chinese government wants.