Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

China’s Core Interests Made Crystal Clear. Ignore At YOUR Peril.

Posted in China Business, Legal News

If you want a watered-down, not horribly written, somewhat sanitized, quasi-westernized version of what the Chinese government is thinking (and get some decent photos to boot), there is probably nothing better than the Global Times.

The Global Times just came out with an article that says pretty much nothing new, but its coming out and saying it and its doing so in the way that it did is at least somewhat significant. The article is entitled, “Political system now China’s core interest” and it essentially says that “China’s political system and ensuring sustainable economic and social development” will be China’s primary drivers:

The Chinese government released the White Paper on China’s Peaceful Development Tuesday, redefining the scope of China’s core interests.

For the first time, China’s political system and ensuring sustainable economic and social development have been officially declared as being among China’s core interests.

This redefinition is timely. Other items included in the core interests are state sovereignty, national security, territorial integrity and national reunification, which remain the same as before. China has been familiar with foreign challenges aimed at the four latter interests and has experience in dealing with them. However, the country lacks knowledge in how to protect these newly defined core interests in the process of reform and opening-up. 

People hold different opinions on the influence of reform on China’s political system at home and abroad. There are also questions over whether reform should come at the cost of social stability, but defining these controversial topics as being among the nation’s core interests shows China’s decisive attitude.    

Implementing reform is difficult, and so is controlling its direction. It is as risky to make a breakthrough as restricting the areas in which reform can operate. China needs to learn lessons from those socially unstable cases to enhance its awareness of social stability. China must continue to advance its political reform, as its goal is not to subvert the country’s basic political system, but to make the system more effective.

Blindly advocating change within China’s political system is irresponsible. Social unrest is inevitable if a political system is rapidly replaced or abolished in a big power like China. It is unknown whether there is a political system more suitable for China. Several generations have taken over six decades to change the country’s fate. China cannot pursue an illusory “political paradise” at the cost of their efforts and broader peace.

As China has increasingly become a competitor to Western countries, weakening China by disrupting its reform has become an open policy in the West. China is facing a worsening reform environment as compared to the 1980s, but it should accelerate the pace of reform according to its own needs and prevent the West from making the country deviate from this path.

Chinese society should reach a consensus on the direction of China’s reform and core interests. However, China is confronted with many obstacles in reaching a consensus. Newly emerging communication platforms seemingly provide more opportunities to divide opinion.

The new expression of core interests Tuesday provided political support for society to find agreement. Such a clear official statement is helpful in eliminating some social confusion. The cohesion of Chinese society direly needs the help of the government.

Why is this important and what does it mean? It means what we here at China Law Blog have always said. That Beijing’s core interest is the Chinese system and to the extent business or the economy (and certainly foreign business) conflict with that, they will be subordinated. Nothing really new here, just nice to see it articulated so bluntly and so clearly. 

What do you think?

  • xyz

    Indeed, very nice to see the CPC come out and state its aims so clearly. I distilled this entire editorial down into one sentence: A core aim of the CCP is to maintain the pre-eminence of the CCP. Hmm…
    The logic of paragraph 6 is particularly seductive, and is a classic example of a straw man argument. It’s pretty darn tricky to counter an argument that doesn’t actually exist. Who is blindly advocating change? Who is “pursuing an illusory ‘political paradise’”? Moving on…
    “Chinese society should reach a consensus on the direction of China’s reform and core interests.” Great. I’m really looking forward to following the debate on CCTV and Weibo as all angles of China’s future direction are given a full and fair airing.

  • http://www.xuway.com Marc

    China is one of the few system that does something for people not just banks. While the US has now 42 million poor, China has lifted 100 of millions out of poverty.
    When you see how China handles national disasters you see a system that pretty much delivers when Japan for example has collapsed.
    Each region has its own history, achievements and values but it is high time to give China credit for what it does and not just hammer at what is different from us.

  • Ron Mael

    The Global Times as recommended China reading. Fantastic.

  • LH

    If I were a weibo operator, I’d be pretty nervous reading this: “Newly emerging communication platforms seemingly provide more opportunities to divide opinion.” That’s about as specific as the piece gets in calling someone out as a culprit (well, other than the West as a whole, but that’s nothing new for the GT).
    -LH

  • Comms

    Well xyz, read on to get more on fair airing:
    Newly emerging communication platforms seemingly provide more opportunities to divide opinion.
    The dawn of the end of weibo wonderland ?

  • Louis Godena

    Sounds like the Chinese government is a lot like all governments; self-preservation is a key goal. I think China is particularly anxious to avoid the fate of the Soviet Union. It sees Gorbachev’s reforms as the epitome of blind, reckless change that sought a sort of “illusory political paradise.” The results were disastrous. A good recent book is *China Learns from the Soviet Union.* It explains a lot about the CCP’s attitude toward recent history, as well as its determination to avoid repeating it.

  • Hua Qiao

    I’d just like to see China enact the system they say they have in the Constitution. Go read it on the People’s Daily website and see if that document describes at all what you see in the PRC today.

  • http://Www.inpraiseofchina.com Godfree Roberts

    There’s an impression in the West that the kind of public discussion that’s needed to incarnate this policy does not happen. And that the “authoritarian” government will ram through whatever legislation it chooses.
    That approach actually characterizes our own, US, government more than the Chinese if we pause to think about it. The Patriot Act, to choose a grotesque example, was drafted by persons unknown and passed in the dead of night by politicians who had not even read it. Talk about authoritarian rubber stamping!
    The process by which the Chinese government reaches the policy implementation stage is not so much opaque as private. It happens off-camera not for sinister reasons but because millions (hundreds of million?) private considerations taking up to 30 years are devoted to ensuring that legislation has been well considered.
    We are often surprised at the speed of implementation once Chinese policy or legislation is announced. But usually the implementations have been preparing themselves for years by the time of the public announcement.
    At that point, it’s just preaching to the already-converted.
    This is one of the reasons the Chinese people have come to trust their government so overwhelmingly.
    Of course, the overwhelming success of it’s policies helps, too.

  • Hua Qiap

    @ marc
    It’s great that they lifted 100 million out of poverty. But it was the same party that initiated the Great Leap Forward which killed tens of millions. The same party that ruthlessly obliterated some of the best and the brightest in the Cultural Revolution. So it is pretty easy to show progress starting from a poor base. Don’t forget “let 100 flowers bloom…” When you have 300 million connected priveleged ones standing on the shoulders of 1 billion lao bai xing who live in poor conditions, eat tainted food, breathe polluted air and drink bad water with no chance to get ahead because the Party controls everything, i do think people need to speak up. There’s room for criticism.
    As for disasters, that was great how they handled the Wenzhou train crash, by burying the evidence. Really good that they jailed the people demanding an investigation of poor school construction in Sichuan after the tofu schools collapsed in the earthquake.
    Don’t just listen to the glorious announcments of Uncle Wen, however. Instead, follow what really happens. You won’t read It in the Global Times. Try Caixin if you want something closer to the whole truth.

  • MHB

    Whether one is anti-China or pro-China, this statement shows a political maturity that is so rare to find in Western politics. China’s political leaders recognise they are cultural and social leaders.
    Their decisions affect the path of the country. They affect it’s future. They affect the choices given to future generations – their view is holistic in a way Western politics is not.
    Western politics is, unsurprisingly with its multi-party systems, far more partial and prone to division. Choices are made on individual issues. For example, the banking crisis has been dealt with entirely separately from any other social problem.
    The recent UK riots are another good example – commentators and politicians allege the riots were caused by poverty, by too much social welfare and by anything else in between. Causation is nonsense – but the riots are part of the bigger picture. The banking crisis and every other facet of British society cannot be separated from the riots – not because of any causal connection but because they share the same soil and affect the growth of British society.
    The holistic perspectives (of Chinese medicine) are ignored in Western politics, but the health of society is very much on the agenda for China’s leaders.
    Whether they handle social changes well and for what ends is a different question. At least they are aware of their part in the social structure and of their responsibilities towards it.

  • Marc

    @Xiao Hua
    I am living in China and I see with my own eyes what is good and what is not.
    You can report everything indeed as China is transforming at different speed from one place to the other. The rest is about personal agendas, yours is pretty clear.
    I am just fed up with China bashing which feeds the relative ignorance of readers.
    China is much more than that.

  • Volker Müller

    It is important not just to read the headline, but the whole text
    1. China’s political system and
    2. ensuring sustainable economic and
    3. social development
    have been officially declared as being among China’s core interests. (“1.,2.,3.” added by me).
    China sees these three points as a unity, no social development without the political system and sustainable economic development. But also no stable political system without sustainable economic and social development.
    There is nothing wrong with this point of view.

  • Richard

    Dan: looks like you’re really starting to attract the panda huggers to your comments section to police any slightly-less-than-pro-CCP attitudes. I guess you must be doing something right.

  • China educator

    I completely agree with you on the value of reading China’s official and semi-official press. I started doing that a few years ago and now it seems that whenever someone expresses surprise at what China is doing I can refer them back to an article that made very clear China would be doing exactly what it is now doing. These articles really can be quite amazing in that way.

  • Tom

    @”Marc” Your post isn’t genuine. It’s been ghost-written, and from the other reactions it’s clear you’re not fooling anyone. You identify as a foreigner, but this ruse is as easily seen through as a Groucho-Marx disguise pair of glasses. Your standard-issue “lay off the poor state” argument sounds as tinny as a soap-opera product pitch, and has no place on an actual community forum. The forum, I presume, is for real individuals to have dialogue. Not states or corporations.