Sinosure is scary, but it can be vanquished.
Sinosure is scary, but it can be vanquished.

Nearly all Chinese companies that provide credit to foreign businesses do so because their invoices are insured by Sinosure. Sinosure is a massive China-based export and credit insurance company, as explained by Wikipedia:

Sinosure offers coverage against political risks, commercial and credit risks. This includes short-, medium- and long-term export credit insurance, investment insurance, bond and guarantee business, debt and capital retrieval business and credit assessment business. Investment guarantees cover political risks such as currency and remittance restrictions, expropriation and nationalization, sovereign breaches of contract and war.

Sinosure also provides support for export financing. In March 2011, in reached an agreement with J.P. Morgan to provide a wide array of financial services to exporters, with SINOSURE covering J.P. Morgan’s exposure.

Sinosure also covers SMEs (since 2005, even those with export volumes of under 2 million dollars a year that are unable to bear the political and commercial risks of international trade. The company also provides coverage for foreign investment by Chinese companies, this time most often by large SOEs.

Foreign companies typically do not deal at all with Sinosure unless and until they have a payment dispute with their Chinese product supplier. When that happens, Sinosure usually steps in and threatens to sue. Sinosure does this by hiring debt collection lawyers in the debtor’s country to pursue the debts of the Chinese manufacturers it insures. Sinosure has in the last few years, and especially in the last year, gotten quite aggressive in pursuing collection outside of China.

Sinosure usually enters the picture as follows:

  1. Foreign company (for purposes of this example, a U.S. company) buys $2 million of widgets from Chinese manufacturer for export to the United States.
  2. U.S company pays Chinese company $1.4 million upfront for the widgets, with the remaining $600,000 to be paid upon approved delivery.
  3. The widgets that arrive in the United States are of poor quality.
  4. The U.S. company refuses to pay the remaining $600,000.
  5. The Chinese manufacturer and the U.S. company seek to work out a deal and while that is happening, the U.S. company gets a threatening letter from a U.S. law firm claiming to represent Sinosure.
  6. The Chinese manufacturer will insist it never contacted Sinosure and that the U.S. company should just ignore Sinosure. The Chinese manufacturer will deny that Sinosure has any authority to act on its behalf and it will tell the U.S. company to just pay the Chinese manufacturer and if it does so all will be fine. In the meantime, Sinosure is claiming that if the US company just pays Sinosure, all will be fine.
  7. Oftentimes, even sub-suppliers start contacting the U.S. company to get paid.

Here are some basics you should know if anything like the above happens to you:

  1. Do not expect the law firm representing Sinosure to have any awareness of why you have not paid your China manufacturer.
  2. Do not expect the law firm representing Sinosure to know the correct amount you would owe to your China manufacturer, even if you did actually owe your China manufacturer anything at all.
  3. Do not expect the law firm representing Sinosure to care about ##1 and 2 above. At all. It’s only goal is to get you to as quickly as possible pay as much as possible so that its contingency fee is as much as possible.
  4. Do not even think about settling with Sinosure without making 100% certain that your doing so will actually resolve ALL claims against you. Do not pay Sinosure without a proper written agreement (in Chinese) that makes clear that you have resolved all of your claims against Sinosure and against any Chinese manufacturer that might be able to argue you owe it money. This agreement needs to work in both China and the United States and it must be signed by all parties (including your Chinese manufacturers) or you could face very troubling additional lawsuits down the road. Sinosure’s lawyers will deny the importance of this but that is because they just want to get paid.

What then should you do if you are contacted by a law firm representing Sinosure?

The first thing you should do is take seriously. If you do not pay Sinosure, it will add your name to a list of foreign companies it will cease to insure. This virtually always will mean that none of your China suppliers (past, present or future) will extend you any credit on your purchases. So the next time you need to order $2 million in widgets, you will need to pay the full $2 million upfront. This is not tenable for most companies because having to do this increases both the risk of getting bad product and the amount that will be lost from getting bad product. But that is exactly what will happen to you if you just ignore Sinosure.

Here are a few more things you should know about dealing with Sinosure’s debt collection attorneys:

  • If you are not paying your Chinese supplier because you are having cash flow problems, Sinosure will not listen.
  • If you are not paying your Chinese supplier because your supplier gave you bad product, Sinosure will “listen” if you do certain key things to “make” Sinosure listen. Sinosure’s lawyers will probably tell you that your reason for not paying does not matter, but that is just because they want you to pay so that they can get their contingency fee quickly. Like I said, it will be incumbent upon you to make Sinosure listen.

My firm’s international litigators have developed a whole host of strategies for dealing with Sinosure, with the specific strategies varying depending on the situation and risk tolerance of the companies we are representing. I cannot reveal those strategies publicly for the simple reason that we do not want Sinosure or its lawyers to know them. You instead will just need to trust me when I say that when Sinosure comes calling you have plenty 0f options beyond just letting Sinosure roll all over you or losing your ability to buy on credit from China.


Photo of Dan Harris Dan Harris

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network. 

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network.  His work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

He was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), is rated 10.0 by (also its highest rating), and is a recognized SuperLawyer.

Dan is a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and constantly travels between the United States and Asia. He most commonly speaks on China law issues and is the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog. Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed Dan regarding various aspects of his international law practice.

Dan is licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at his firm, Dan focuses on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.