Our China lawyers often review leases for companies early in the WFOE registration process. Our work in this area has been growing exponentially as word has gotten around regarding WFOE registrations increasingly going awry and landlord problems stemming from WFOE leases.

The pendency of a WFOE formation is a complicated time for a commercial lease because of issues surrounding who the tenant on the lease should be. Should it be the foreign company that will be owning the WFOE or should it be the not yet formed WFOE?

Most of the time when we are called in to review these leases, the line on the lease where the tenant’s name should go has been left blank. The company that retains us has no idea what company to list as the tenant and so they hire us to help. Choosing the tenant is a significant issue and — as is typical for so much else in China — different cities require different procedures.

The following two approaches are typically followed in China for the tenant of a WFOE to be:

  • Specify the U.S. (or other foreign country) parent company as the tenant on the lease. If this is done, it is important that the tenant be the company that will be the parent company of the WFOE (and not some other entity). The lease should also specifically provide that when the WFOE is actually formed, the landlord will allow the lease to be assigned to the WFOE at no cost. Some landlords will require a time limit, some do not care. Failing to put this into the lease upfront can lead to the landlord charging an exorbitant amount to allow the assignment, which assignment you will need to get your WFOE registered.
  • Specify the WFOE as the tenant. You cannot use this method unless a name for the WFOE has already been approved. Under this approach, the landlord normally will require a time limit for the formation of the WFOE. Various remedies are proposed for dealing with the situation where the WFOE is never formed. This is a very awkward method, since a non-existent entity is being specified as the tenant. However, recently the Shanghai government has begun insisting that this method be used. Again, it is critical that your method complies with local requirements.

Determining how to proceed regarding the named tenant requires input from the local government authorities who will approve the WFOE. If your lease does not handle the lessee issue properly, the government generally will not approve your WFOE and/or you will end up having to incur all sorts of additional landlord and contracting costs.

If the U.S. (or other foreign country) company is listed as the tenant, the U.S. company will be required to pay the rent and the security deposit and other fees. Since the U.S. company is not a Chinese company, it will be required to pay these fees in U.S. dollars and that creates the following issues, among others:

  • The landlord must be willing to accept payment of initial rent and deposit in U.S. dollars.
  • The management company must be willing to accept payment of its management fees in U.S. dollars.
  • The utility companies must be willing to accept payment of their fees in U.S. dollars.

All of this can be quite complex and in many Chinese cities, the utility companies simply will not accept dollar payments. Many landlords will also refuse to accept U.S. dollar payments.

It is also important that the lease for a potential WFOE address the issues arising from WFOE formation. Our China lawyers typically draft a lease addendum that addresses the following:

  • The landlord acknowledges that the lease will be used for legal address for a WFOE.
  •  The landlord warrants that the leased premises is legally suited for use as a WFOE address.
  • The landlord agrees to cooperate with all documentation and procedures required for use of the lease in the WFOE formation process.
  • The landlord agrees to register the lease as required and to provide tax receipts for all rental payments. If there is a problem with the premises in terms of zoning or payment of fees, the government will refuse to register.
  • The landlord agrees to provide proof of ownership of the premises before execution of the lease.
  • The landlord agrees that if the lease is rejected by the government in connection with the WFOE formation process, the lease will terminate and the landlord will refund all payments made up to the date of termination.

Many landlords — particularly smaller landlords and landlords in cities with little foreign direct investment — will refuse to execute such an addendum. When that is the case, our job as lawyers is to discuss the costs and benefits of increased due diligence and the various risks involved in moving forward, or not.

 

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Dan Harris Dan Harris

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network. 

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network.  His work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

He was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), is rated 10.0 by AVVO.com (also its highest rating), and is a recognized SuperLawyer.

Dan is a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and constantly travels between the United States and Asia. He most commonly speaks on China law issues and is the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog. Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed Dan regarding various aspects of his international law practice.

Dan is licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at his firm, Dan focuses on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.