Yet many foreign investors still want to enter the Chinese market through equity joint ventures thought the particular risks involved with JVs require careful planning. One way to reduce your risk is by conducting due diligence on your potential Chinese joint venture partner before you tie the knot.
Another way is by making sure you will control the joint venture. Since most foreign investors wish to maintain control over their Chinese joint venture, this issue is usually paramount.
Yet our China lawyers far too often see foreign investors make a mistake that effectively leaves them without control —a mistake so fundamental that it accounts for most of the failed equity joint ventures in China. The mistake is assuming Chinese joint ventures are managed according to a Western model, under which the board of directors controls the company.
Most foreign investors strive to obtain a 51% ownership interest in their equity joint ventures, assuming this will give them the right to elect the entire board and thereby control the company. After winning the struggle for percentage ownership of the joint venture, foreign investors frequently will allow the Chinese side to appoint the equity joint venture’s two key management positions, the Legal Representative and the General Manager. But these “concessions” are all part of the Chinese side’s plan, and effectively render board control meaningless.
Control over a Chinese joint venture actually comes from the following:
- The power to appoint and remove the China joint venture’s Legal Representative.
- The power to appoint and remove the General Manager of the China joint venture company. The joint venture agreement must make clear that the General Manager is an employee of the joint venture company employed entirely at the discretion of the Legal Representative (whom you have the power to appoint and remove). Note that this agreement will be enforced under Chinese law and its official version should therefore be in Chinese.
- Control over the company seal, or “chop.” The joint venture partner that controls the joint venture’s registered company seal has the power to make binding contracts on behalf of the joint venture company and to deal with the joint venture company’s banks and other key service providers. The annals of history are filled with foreign companies getting shut out of their China joint ventures after losing control of the seal.
The Chinese side to a joint venture will typically refuse to give the foreign party the above three measures of control. It will argue that it should control the joint venture for reasons of both efficiency and expertise. In many cases, it also will claim it cannot bring its political connections, or guanxi, into play unless its own people fill the Legal Representative and General Manager slots. This argument is usually just a smoke screen for the Chinese side trying to secure the true levers of joint venture control. For more on the difficulties of China joint ventures, check out China Joint Ventures. We Love Them AND We Hate Them.
Using a Chinese lawyer or a “China consultancy” increases your risks. Chinese lawyers are not bound by the same duties of loyalty as American or European lawyers and they not infrequently will work on behalf of your Chinese counterpart. This may be because the Chinese lawyer is getting paid by the Chinese company or it may simply be because the Chinese lawyer knows he or she will make more money if the joint venture deal concludes. Chinese lawyers also owe their paramount duty to the Chinese government and that makes their protecting you and your IP iffy at best. We are aware of consultancies that have represented American and European companies on joint ventures while getting a percentage of the deal from the Chinese side if it goes through.
If you want control over your China joint venture, you should follow the rules set forth above. Otherwise you might find yourself in a venture with no legal right to guide it.
You have been warned.