Exclusive Manufacturing AgreementsOur clients often ask our international manufacturing lawyers to put a provision into their manufacturing agreements that prohibits their manufacturer from making the same product for anyone else. This naturally leads to a long discussion, which often goes somewhat like the following, using laptop computer bags made in Thailand and China as the example:

International Manufacturing Lawyer:  What do you mean by a product like yours?  A laptop bag?

Client: That would be great. Is that possible?

International Manufacturing Lawyer:  Not unless you are planning to commit to buying $800 million worth of bags a year. Your Chinese manufacturer is huge and I’m guessing it makes laptop bags for 40-50 other companies and unless you commit to massive yearly volumes, there is no way it will agree to just make bags for you. What we need to do is figure out what makes your laptop bags different from everyone else’s laptop bags and see if we can get your manufacturer to agree not to make laptop bags for others that contain your unique features.

Client:  That makes sense. Well, first off, our name is unique and I certainly don’t want our manufacturer making bags with our name on it for anyone but us.

International Manufacturing Lawyer: Absolutely. We will put that in there, but also, we are going to need to register your brand name as a trademark in Thailand and China so nobody in either country (not just your manufacturer) can make bags with your name on it. We also need to register your trademark in both countries to prevent anyone from registering your name and then using its trademark to stop you from using your own name  at all in China or Thailand. What else distinguishes your bags from others?

Client: We use orange stitching and I don’t think anyone else does that.

International Manufacturing Lawyer:  Great, so we ask these manufacturers not to make bags with orange stitching. What else?

Client:  We have a side pocket that perfectly holds a passport. What about something like that? Oh, and we have an orange rubber tab on all of our zippers.

International Manufacturing Lawyer:  Perfect. We will put a provision into your Manufacturing Agreements that prohibits your manufacturers from making laptop bags with any of this attributes.

Client: Are these provisions enforced?

International Manufacturing Lawyer:  Yes, in both China/Thailand and the United States and Canada too.

Client:  The United States?

International Manufacturing Lawyers. Yes, the United States. If one of your US or Canadian competitors were to go to your Chinese or Thai factories and start purchasing laptop bags with stitching or zippers or a side pocket like yours, we would immediately send them a letter, attaching your manufacturing contracts with your Chinese and Thai manufacturer. That letter would point out the provision saying your manufacturers are not allowed to make laptop bags with your specific attributes and then it would say that your competitor’s getting such laptop bags from your Chinese/Thai manufacturers constitutes tortious interference with your contractual relations. We would then say that if they do not immediately cease buying such bags, we will have no choice but to sue. These letters generally work because the US/Canadian company either did not know it was infringing on your contract rights or else because it simply does not want to be sued in a US or a Canadian court, even if it may think it will eventually prevail. These provisions tend to be very effective.

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Dan Harris Dan Harris

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network. 

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network.  His work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

He was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), is rated 10.0 by AVVO.com (also its highest rating), and is a recognized SuperLawyer.

Dan is a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and constantly travels between the United States and Asia. He most commonly speaks on China law issues and is the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog. Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed Dan regarding various aspects of his international law practice.

Dan is licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at his firm, Dan focuses on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.