China trademark lawyers

Registering trademarks in China has become essential for doing business in China. We have long advocated prompt China trademark registration with our clients. For companies that manufacture and export from China, registration of the English language trademark is essential. For companies that sell products and services in China, registration of the existing English language marks and the Chinese language marks for the product is essential.

When we first began to push our clients on trademark registration, we were met with skepticism. However, as we anticipated, the tide has turned. Recent reports from China claim China now has the largest number of trademark registrations in the world, with over a million applications submitted per year. It has now become almost impossible to do business in China without a full portfolio of registered English and Chinese language word marks and logos.

Unfortunately, this flood of applications has had the effect of making trademark registration in China a more difficult process. When our international IP lawyers first started doing China trademark registrations 6-7 years ago, about all that was required was to submit the application; virtually every application was approved. In fact, at that time, the Chinese authorities were often criticized for approving too many similar marks. In particular, English language marks were almost always approved except when the exact word was already being used in the exact same class.

These days, it is more common to receive a rejection, both for English language and Chinese marks. It is no longer appropriate to just assume every China trademark application will simply be approved; careful evaluation of every mark is required. Since rejections have become common, it is now risky to build business under a new mark or brand before receiving trademark approval from the China trademark office. Since China’s trademark office is slow in its decisions, this can pose difficulties for companies attempting to penetrate the Chinese market.

There are several reasons for this change in China’s trademark environment:

  1. The large number of applications means there are fewer choices for available marks, particularly when the mark is a meaningful word.
  2. China’s trademark office takes a mechanical approach to determining conflicts. Where the same words appear, the trademark office normally ignores meaning and simply finds a conflict. Thus the trademark office does not allow for adding more words to allow for differentiation. If there is any chance of conflict, the trademark office will find it. For example, if someone already has registered the name “Ace” in a particular class, the trademark office will likely reject “Ace Tool and Die Makers and Fabricators” in that same class.
  3. China’s trademark office also finds conflicts where words are similar but not identical. Since there are no clear rules on how much similarity is unacceptable, this makes China trademark office decisions difficult to predict. For example, registering “Alberta” in a class in which “Albert” has already been registered likely will be rejected, but maybe not.
  4. The Chinese language presents additional difficulty. Though there are over 40,000 unique Chinese characters, only about 2,500 characters are commonly used. It is therefore difficult to find a succession of characters that is any way unique. Since there is no way to alter spelling/pronunciation to produce a difference, the opportunity to find a unique and intelligible combination in Chinese can sometimes be difficult.
  5. China’s  trademark office has installed sophisticated search software. This search software fuzzy logic function is excellent and allows the trademark office to find more near matches than previously possible. These near matches then get rejected in situations that would never have been noticed in the past.
  6. As a matter of bureaucratic reality, where there is a close call, it is much safer for the trademark office to reject than to approve.  When a dispute arises, the Chinese courts seem inclined to support trademark office rejections than to support approvals. Since the trademark office has been criticized for allowing too many approvals it seems to have decided to go in the other direction to compensate.

None of the reasons for the difficulties with China trademark registrations are likely to change for the better in the near future. In fact, China trademark registration applications will probably continue to increase, making the situation progressively worse, not better.

So what should be done? Since trademark registration is essential for China, foreign businesses must understand and adapt to the changed trademark environment. This requires at least the following:

  1. Trademark registration should not be treated as a mechanical process. Careful planning is required. In particular, a preliminary search should be undertaken and time allowed to do the search carefully and to deal with the results in a practical manner.
  2. For word marks, the use of meaningful words should be avoided as much as possible. Coined words should be used whenever possible. Of course, a company that is using its existing foreign country name or mark often does not have a choice on the words to be used. In such a case, the foreign party must understand that if a meaningful word is used there is a decent chance a conflict will be found and your trademark rejected. This is also true of trademarks of common names. So for example, if your company is called “David’s ties” and someone has already registered David & Goliath in the same class, you will probably be rejected. We are finding that common name registrations are getting more and more difficult.
  3. Even when a search seems to show there will not be a problem with registration, it is still difficult to predict how the China trademark office will rule on any mark. This uncertainty means it is not as good idea to build brand identity on a mark until after that mark has been formally approved by the China trademark office.
  4. There are numerous ways to deal with trademark conflicts. This usually involves negotiating for a license or related agreement with the holder of the mark with priority. Most foreign companies have a well-deserved aversion to entering into such discussions with parties in China. However, such negotiations will be increasingly important in the new trademark environment.
  5. Some of the conflicting marks are not good marks. Some have never been used. Some have been filed with bad intent. The Chinese trademark system has available a number of procedures for dealing with these bad marks. The procedures take time and money. However, they often must be used to deal with these situations.

Dealing with China’s changing trademark environment is one of the many challenges that must be overcome to reach success in an ever changing China.

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Dan Harris Dan Harris

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network. 

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network.  His work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

He was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), is rated 10.0 by AVVO.com (also its highest rating), and is a recognized SuperLawyer.

Dan is a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and constantly travels between the United States and Asia. He most commonly speaks on China law issues and is the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog. Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed Dan regarding various aspects of his international law practice.

Dan is licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at his firm, Dan focuses on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.