China lawyersOne of the things I love about my job is hearing about the next big thing. Most next big things never actually become a big thing, but the fun is in the sorting. Any time I get together with a client, the discussion invariably turns to the “next” country, with “next” country very roughly meaning the country where manufacturers will move to reduce their costs. Implicit in these discussions is that the “next” country has an almost unlimited capacity to supply sufficient low cost labor to step in as a China replacement.

But of course this assumption is silly, as was brought to light in a recent FT article Fewer, more demanding workers for Vietnamese factories focused on recent labor strikes in Vietnam and on the increasing difficulty in staffing factories there:

Prices of food and accommodation are rising faster than wages, making countryside dwellers reluctant to take factory jobs in far-away cities and industrial zones. That has led to a significant labour shortage in the electronics and garment making industries, according to the Vietnamese government.

“Some people tell us they would rather engage in petty trade than work in factories,” says Jonathan Pincus, an economist who runs Harvard University’s Vietnam program in Ho Chi Minh City and has been researching labour issues. “It’s hard work, with unpleasant conditions, a lot of forced overtime and little freedom.”

Some Japanese manufacturers, who dominate the industrial parks of northern Vietnam, have found it difficult to hire enough workers of late, especially for bigger factories with more than 300 employees, says Hirokazu Yamaoka, head of Japan’s trade promotion body in Hanoi. Japanese employers have noticed that Vietnamese workers have been getting more selective about factory jobs, he says, weighing up working conditions as well as pay. Factories without air conditioning and those that use potentially hazardous chemical processes are particularly unpopular.

The article goes on to quote an employer on wages potentially hitting “unsustainable” levels and then discusses how employers “have started offering more generous inducements to lure workers, such as free monthly sacks of rice, free accommodation and annual staff holidays.”

The article then discusses how Vietnam, “unlike China” does not have large pools of migrant workers desperate for factory jobs. I hear this again and again from our clients with facilities in both China and in Vietnam. They tell me  hometowns/farming areas of Vietnam are typically nicer and more productive than in China and so it is much easier to hit a “tipping point” in Vietnam where the workers will simply choose to stay in or return to their hometowns, rather than keep working in a remote factory. They also tell me that as China’s wages and other costs continue to increase and as more manufacturing moves to Vietnam from China, Vietnam necessarily experiences the same rising cost effects.

I guess this is where Myanmar comes in. I had lunch the other day with a friend who is (I think) the only person I know who is completely fluent in Burmese. He told me of how he is getting a shockingly high onslaught of calls from companies (mostly in the pharmaceuticals business) wanting to go to Myanmar. My friend’s view is that it is too early/too risky.

After that lunch, I started talking about Myanmar, expecting people to mostly just laugh. Wrong. Nearly everyone is intrigued and many of them have conducted a “preliminary analysis.” Then just this week, no fewer than two people I know who had been talking about going to Vietnam for vacation told me they are now considering Myanmar. One of them said it’s for vacation, but it’s also to see what is going on there “business-wise.”

At the same time, I would be remiss if I did not mention that the new consensus is that globalization leads to declining wages and increasing inequality in the United States. For more on this, check out this New York Times article, As Jobs Go Global, U.S. Workers Pay.

Myanmar, the next big thing? What do you think? Will Globalization continue and if so, until when?

Photo of Dan Harris Dan Harris

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network. 

Dan is a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

He primarily represents companies doing business in emerging market countries, having spent years building and maintaining a global, professional network.  His work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

He was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), is rated 10.0 by (also its highest rating), and is a recognized SuperLawyer.

Dan is a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and constantly travels between the United States and Asia. He most commonly speaks on China law issues and is the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog. Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed Dan regarding various aspects of his international law practice.

Dan is licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at his firm, Dan focuses on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.