Until a few years ago, English language trademarks were relatively easy to secure in China. We would figure out the right trademark category or categories under China’s trademarking system, we would pick the right classes within the category(ies), and then we would get approval from the China Trademark Office to file the particular trademark. Then we would wait for the actual trademark registration to issue.
The rapid increase in trademark filings in China over the last few years has made filing for a trademark in China much more difficult. Let me explain.
In the old days, once we had counseled our client on what China’s Trademark Office allows and does not allow as a trademark, we were able to secure registration of virtually every English language trademark we sought to file. China’s Trademark Office would approve virtually everything for trademark registration because it did not consider the trademark we were seeking to file would likely cause confusion for the average Chinese consumer. In other words, what we were seeking to have registered as a Chinese trademark was different enough from all existing Chinese trademarks in the same category so as not to cause confusion for Chinese consumers.
But with the onslaught of trademark filings in China, we are now quite frequently having to go back and tell our clients either that there is no way their proposed China trademark will be accepted by the China Trademark Office or that there is at least some or a good likelihood that it will not. At that point, we work with them on deciding whether to go forward in trying to secure the trademark or in trying to come up with a new one.
In many cases, what the Chinese Trademark Office considers likely to cause confusion will be very different from what most English speakers would expect. The problem arises from the fact that English language names and Roman alphabet acronyms are viewed by the China Trademark Offices as images. So if you are seeking to register something like the word “Aviation” as your trademark and someone else has already registered the word “Avatar” as its trademark in the same category for which you are seeking to register “Aviation,” there is at least a decent chance the China Trademark Office will refuse to register your “Aviation” trademark. It might refuse to register the name “Aviation” in China because it might see it as being too close to the already registered “Avatar” trademark and therefore likely to cause confusion for the average Chinese consumer.
This also has been happening fairly frequently with acronyms and made up three letter names. As an example (based on a number of trademark matters we have handled, but completely made up for this post), let’s say you want to register the trademark “ABC” in a particular category. You go to the Chinese Trademark Office and request it register the trademark “ABC” in the China trademark category you have chosen. You have done the trademark search in that particular category of Chinese trademarks and have found that nobody has yet registered “ABC” as a trademark within that category and you are not anticipating any problems. But you almost certainly do. There is a very good chance the Chinese trademark office will reject your “ABC” filing because it is too close to a previously filed trademark, such as “CBA.”
Now I know all of this probably sounds crazy to you as an English speaker, but when you really think about it, it is not.
If you are fluent in English, ‘Aviation” is one word and “Avatar” is clearly another. And if you are fluent in English, “ABC” is nothing like “CBA.” But if you are the average Chinese consumer, (which means you do not read English) and you see these four “items” as nothing more than images, then it is not so crazy to think that there might be confusion between the words “Aviation” and “Avatar” and between “ABC” and “CBA.” And since confusion to the average Chinese consumer is the standard and since that is the standard by which China’s Trademark Office determines what trademarks it will and will not register, it is really not so crazy after all.
So what can you do if you want to register “ABC” and the Trademark Office will not allow you to do so because it views “CBA” as confusingly similar? You can appeal to China’s Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) and if you fail there, you can take it to the Chinese courts. The key is usually showing/proving (oftentimes through consumer surveys) that the Trademark Office was wrong about the likelihood of confusion for the average Chinese customer.
Chinese trademarking…..not so easy any more.
What have you been seeing out there on this?
UPDATE: Stan Abrams over at China Hearsay did a post on China trademarks as well today, entitled, “China Trademarks: When Similar Ain’t So Similar,” in which he analyzes a few examples of similar looking names and logos to determine whether they violate China trademarks.

Dan Harris

I am a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

I mostly represent companies doing business in emerging market countries. It has taken me many years to build my network and it takes constant communication and travel to maintain it. My work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

I was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, I am AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), I am rated 10.0 by AVVO.com (its highest rating), and I am a SuperLawyer.

I am a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and I constantly travel between the United States and Asia. I most commonly speak on China law issues and I am the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog (www.chinalawblog.com). Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed me regarding various aspects of my international law practice.

I am licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at my firm, I focus on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.