By Steve Dickinson
The recent detentions of four Rio Tinto executives has caused much concern. However, the situation has been misunderstood by most in the West because of a failure to understand the legal background.
The Rio Tinto employees are accused of conducting industrial espionage. Specifically, they are accused of bribery and theft of trade secrets. These acts are crimes under Chinese law. Therefore, if the accusations are factual, the four Rio Tinto employees are subject to criminal sanction in China, with typical prison sentences of up to four years.
The only thing unusual about this case is the decision of the Chinese government to treat the matter not as a commercial trade secrecy violation, but rather, as a theft of state secrets. I assume the reason for this is that the allegedly stolen information is in fact highly secret and damaging to the position of the Chinese companies in the iron ore price negotiations with Rio Tinto. The Chinese are probably avoiding a criminal trial so as to better maintain the secrecy of the information. The underlying issue, however, is that if the accusations are true, the Rio Tinto employees and their collaborators committed a serious violation of Chinese law. The choice of the government to follow the state secrets route should not obscure this fundamental fact.
What does all this mean for other companies doing business in China? This proceeding is actually not a sudden shift in Chinese policy. Foreign companies need to understand the fundamental fact that if you violate Chinese law you will be arrested and punished. There is no free pass because you are foreign or because you work for a foreign company.
The market data situation is quite common in China. The Chinese market is only partially open and operates according to rules different from the U.S. and Europe. This is particularly true with respect to free flow of information. Market information is carefully controlled by the Chinese government. Foreign companies are not permitted to do independent market analysis in China, and private Chinese companies are also strongly discouraged from providing such information.
Foreign companies operating in China therefore find the lack of market date to be a serious impediment to doing business in China. Since market data is not available from normal public sources, there is a strong temptation for foreign companies to collect data using questionable or openly illegal methods. Bribery of the target company’s accountant or bookkeeper is one of those common techniques. Though common, such practices are illegal and pose a significant risk of prosecution for a crime or worse. The Rio Tinto matter is an example of what constitutes “worse”.
Our advice is that foreign companies must strictly follow Chinese law. Commercial espionage is illegal in China. Theft of trade secrets and bribery are crimes. Many foreign business people think the worst that will happen if they engage in this activity is that they will be sued by their competitor. They are then surprised when they are greeted not by a process server but rather by a group of police officers who escort them to jail. Once they are in jail, there is little we attorneys can do to help. No commercial advantage is worth spending even one day in a Chinese jail, let alone being subject to the tender mercies of the state security bureau. The only sensible course of action is to avoid all such activity in China. If your business in China cannot be conducted without resorting to unlawful actions, leave China. It is that simple.
Dan’s Note: For more on business and crime in China, check out “Amazing Lawyers and The Criminal Side of China Business” and “Criminal Law and Business in China — A Strong Caution.” For more on the Rio Tinto case, check out this Wall Street Journal article and this New York Times article, both of which quote Steve on the case.

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Dan Harris

I am a founder of Harris Bricken, an international law firm with lawyers in Los Angeles, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, China and Spain.

I mostly represent companies doing business in emerging market countries. It has taken me many years to build my network and it takes constant communication and travel to maintain it. My work has been as varied as securing the release of two improperly held helicopters in Papua New Guinea, setting up a legal framework to move slag from Canada to Poland’s interior, overseeing hundreds of litigation and arbitration matters in Korea, helping someone avoid terrorism charges in Japan, and seizing fish product in China to collect on a debt.

I was named as one of only three Washington State Amazing Lawyers in International Law, I am AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (its highest rating), I am rated 10.0 by AVVO.com (its highest rating), and I am a SuperLawyer.

I am a frequent writer and public speaker on doing business in Asia and I constantly travel between the United States and Asia. I most commonly speak on China law issues and I am the lead writer of the award winning China Law Blog (www.chinalawblog.com). Forbes Magazine, Fortune Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, Investors Business Daily, Business Week, The National Law Journal, The Washington Post, The ABA Journal, The Economist, Newsweek, NPR, The New York Times and Inside Counsel have all interviewed me regarding various aspects of my international law practice.

I am licensed in Washington, Illinois, and Alaska.

In tandem with the international law team at my firm, I focus on setting up/registering companies overseas (via WFOEs, Rep Offices or Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts (NDAs, OEM Agreements, licensing, distribution, etc.), protecting IP (trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and patents), and overseeing M&A transactions.