<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>China Law Blog - The Impact Of China's Labor Contract Law. - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/</link>
      <description>China Law for Business</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:42:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>FOARP</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Dan and Brad, ties all the strings together. Nice to hear that Huawei's tactics are being opposed, good also to know that doomsday has not dawned. Anything on the effect on NDAs - particularly in software development? I know that some folk were predicting bad consequences - I wasn't inclined to believe them though.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11901</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11901</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tim</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Great post. But it has left me with a couple of questions:</p>

<p>Has the Guangdong ruling that has thwarted Huawei’s dubious HR strategy also affected Carrefour? Is this particular ruling binding only in the Guangdong or would it be deemed enforceable throughout China? </p>

<p>Also, you mention that Chinese employees’ rights are still lacking compared to the West, can you give examples of this? </p>

<p>John – I believe the point of their argument was that the LCL did not have a drastic affect on properly run companies. Companies were forced out of business because the LCL made it more difficult to operate illegally. Unfortunately, poor business ethics does not preclude a successful business strategy.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11902</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11902</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bruce</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>does the new law really works? <br />
I don't think so. At least it won't work properly in the next 3-5 yrs. Most new laws in China won't performs well as people don't really care about it. I don't know other places, but in Jiangsu, there are still many companies and facotries do not follow Labor Law. They just simply don't care.</p>

<p>A recent social compliance and factory audit conducted by one of our auditor shows that. There is one garment factory in WUXI who not only hire people under age, but more than 12 hours / day working hours make them sooooo exhausted especially while the working condition really sucks. Did they follow the rules? NO, they completely broken most labor laws. and guess what they said to our auditor after the audit ? They asked us to tell the vendor that's how they work and that's why they sell the product cheap. (The vendor made small order, and i guess that's why the factory just don't care)</p>

<p>Factories like this one exsist everywhere in China and the truth is out there!!</p>

<p>Cheers</p>

<p>Bruce</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11903</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11903</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Jack</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>My parent company has many divisions, and many companies in China. My particular company - approx 400 staff - will be the first to have a labour union; others are also in process of setting up their unions.</p>

<p>Whilst the decision has already been taken at corporate level its not mine to dispute, just to make the most of what the new playing field is. I have not seen any collective bargaining 'rights' in the set-up documents available, Pragmatically I look at the corporate position we adopt - strict compliance with the new LCL - being consistent with the unions purpose as occuppying the space a more millitant and less business freindly 'western-style' union might want to be in.</p>

<p>Interestingly, I am also invited to join - though I might baulk at getting value for my 2 kuai dues - and so long as it is consistent with my employers corporate policy I see no downside to experiencing it 'from the inside'.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11904</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11904</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bill</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the enlightening article. Our business is mainly export from China to the US and we've noticed that almost all of our supplier factories use the LCL as an excuse to increase their prices, sometimes arbitrarily.  When we press harder, they usually relent and go back to the pre-LCL pricing.  This leads me to believe that your basic thesis is correct: the law is not as severe of a cause of price hikes as most of us exporters are led to believe.  Mostly inflation, the world food price hikes, and oil are the main culprits.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11905</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11905</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>lois Shane</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>according to my last year's living experience in dongguan - one of the major "made in China"basement cities ,the new labor law effected different entities in different levels. for instance, local manufacturing factories paid more attention to it than local private owned companies and agencies.<br />
besides,personally I believe the enforcement on labor law is the engine to start to set up a sound civil court system in China.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11906</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#11906</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Helen </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a very helpful post but it needs updating.  Any chance you will be doing that soon?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#29151</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#29151</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Emmanuel</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>@Helen,<br />
Might I suggest an article by Eli Friedman and Ching Kwan Lee - Remaking the World of Chinese Labour: A 30-year retrospective - published in the British Journal of Industrial Relations in 2010. I also believe that Virginia Ho at Indiana has a detailed (unpublished, yet floating around the internet) analysis of the three new labour laws promulgated around 2007-2008 called "From contracts to compliance: An early look at the implementation of China's New Labor Legislation". </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#43419</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2008/09/the_impact_of_chinas_labor_con.html#43419</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
