<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>China Law Blog - On The Deeper Meaning Of China And International Lawyers. And The Training Required. - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/</link>
      <description>China Law for Business</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:37:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Matthew</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>

<p>Thanks for the positive comments. I agree with your point about knowing when to accept a case and knowing when to refer it to an appropriate expert. One thing my clients expect from me is to be able refer them to an appropriate person in another jurisdiction when needed.</p>

<p>I am quite conservative in this respect. Whilst my training is primarily in Australian tax law I often need to refer questions to Australian tax specialists as there are many areas of Australian tax that I admittedly have little experience in. Law, and in particular tax, is too complicated to expect one person to have all the answers.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2010/02/on_the_deeper_meaning_of_china.html#15778</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2010/02/on_the_deeper_meaning_of_china.html#15778</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">Legal News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:28:28 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
