<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>China Law Blog - Coke's Failed China Deal.  Private Equity Will Live To Do Deals Another Day. - Comments</title>
      <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/</link>
      <description>China Law for Business</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:40:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:40:51 -0800</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>shenlawyer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is just an independent case. It does not represent any changes of Chinese policy of opening up. There are still opportunities. <br />
Coke's failure is just the result of a wrong strategy. It gives Chinese government a good reason to reject it. Those who would like to acquisite Chinese companies must have a very careful plan to go through the approval process.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13221</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13221</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>jessica johanson</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I love China.  I love everything about China: the movies; the cities; the people; and this blog too ...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13222</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13222</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Greg</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Foreigners are permitted to purchase small Chinese companies that the central government is not interested in managing.</p>

<p>my question:  ie, nickel and dime operations that are not profitable and have little chance of pan-Asian or international success?</p>

<p>-- Foreigners are permitted to purchase large, state-owned enterprises that suffer from financial difficulty, provided the foreign investor agrees to restructure the purchased company.</p>

<p>my question: Foreign PE as bailout/stimulus packages?  And how much restructuring is allowed?  If a very good job is done, is the PE firm pushed out for management by provincial/central gov't agencies?</p>

<p>-- Foreigners are permitted to purchase non-majority interests in strong, successful Chinese companies, but only if there is some added benefit, such as transfer of technology, advanced management or access to foreign markets.</p>

<p>my question:  So no investing simply for profit?  And PE firms cannot guarantee market access in their home countries, especially where consumer safety applies (Chinese cars) or the Chinese firm cannot meet regulatory/capital investment requirements.  PE firms might/would face NDA lawsuits for transferring the technology/practices of home country firms they invest in just to get into Chinese firms.</p>

<p>I was just at the Sustainability Summit in Denver and there was a Cleantech presentation regarding PE investment in China.  It's not that PE/VC doesn't want to invest, but they fear to tread in unfamiliar territory and there are more horror stories accumulating from failed ventures. And the investment firms genuinely fear losing their cleantech IP in China and India.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13223</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13223</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Chris</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The issue with Coca Cola and Huiyuan is market share in China. While there are a few beverage makers out there, there are only 2 juice companies with any reach in the market: Huiyuan and Dole. Any visit to a convenience store or supermarket in any major city across China will consistently only offer these 2 brands. Yes, in some cities you can find local brands and "Great Lakes" offers the best apple juice around. But I can't find it in Lianhua, Hualian or Walmart in the area I live.</p>

<p>The refusal of the deal is not unreasonable. As consumers here increasingly move into supermarket shopping, the threat from monopolies is enormous. It is often shocking how few food manufacturers goods are carried in supermarkets in China. Compared to Western countries where a diversity of brands appear across product categories in store, Chinese supermarkets carry products from too few mega suppliers. This is most obvious in the food and beverages area.</p>

<p>I wouldn't get too paranoid about this.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13224</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13224</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>MOLLYRoberts23</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is known that cash can make people free. But how to act if someone doesn't have money? The one way is to get the personal loans or auto loan.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13225</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#13225</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Metin</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Nice calls!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#18211</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#18211</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>1752225</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It's all a tit for tat.  The U.S. blocks big China company deals based on security and China does the same thing against U.S. companies.  None of this is any surprise.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#27279</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#27279</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mike Tulmers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Coke's failure is just the result of a wrong strategy. It gives Chinese government a good reason to reject it. Those who would like to acquisite Chinese companies must have a very careful plan to go through the approval process.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#28359</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#28359</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>PW</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Coke's failure is the result of the wrong strategy. It gave the Chinese government a good reason to reject it. Those who would like to acquire Chinese companies must have a very careful plan to go through the approval process.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#32471</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawblog.com/2009/03/cokes_failed_china_deal_privat.html#32471</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.chinalawblog.com/">China Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
