Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

The Third Stage Of China Business. Chinese Investment In YOUR Company.

Posted in China Business, Legal News

I love it when I read something that tells me what I already knew, but simply had not realized. That happened to me today when I read  a post on the Asia Healthcare Blog by my friend and fellow-Seattleite, Benjamin Shobert, entitled, “Life Sciences Companies Go to China to Raise Capital.”

Ben sets out the three main reasons pharmaceutical companies are going to China: 

[F]irst, and most obviously, build market share in China’s high-growth market. Second, access China’s inexpensive R&D capabilities to complete drug discovery faster and less costly than what is possible in North America or the European Union. But, American pharmaceutical start-ups are beginning to take note of another opportunity in China: as a source of potential investors for their start-ups.

Though my firm has worked on/is working on a deals/potential deals involving Chinese investors in American tech (no pharma) companies, until I read Ben’s post, it had just not occurred to me that this is a trend. But it clearly is. Chinese companies are looking to put their money into United States based companies both in the United States and in China.

Of course, Chinese investing in foreign companies in China is nothing new as they have been doing that via joint ventures (JVs) for more than twenty years. What’s different about today, however, is that in the past foreign companies typically merely allowed Chinese investment when they had no choice. Today, foreign companies are actively seeking Chinese investment because they need the money.

Ben sets out the three key issues foreign companies face when taking in Chinese investment:

  • Losing intellectual property to the Chinese investor
  • Having to turn over the Chinese market to the Chinese investor
  • Eventually having to turn control of the company over to the Chinese investor

Absolutely true. It has been over one (or more) of these three sticking points on which most of the deals on which we have worked have foundered.

The tension is obvious. The American (in our cases) company wants to maintain full control over its IP and is concerned about the Chinese investor taking that IP to one of its other companies. Some of the Chinese companies are quite up front in saying that one of their reasons for investing in the U.S. company is to have full access to the American company’s IP. Most American companies cannot abide by that. The turning over the Chinese market to the Chinese investor is usually the easiest of the three issues because compromise is usually possible by agreeing on a timeline and/or a market sharing arrangement. Surprisingly enough, the same is usually true with respect to turning over the company to the Chinese investor because that too can usually be resolved by agreeing on the preconditions for any turnover and the terms for if and when such a turnover situation is triggered.

Chinese investment in your company. Are you ready for that?

  • Jacob Stokes

    Why is the desire of investors to access company IP a reason for concern in China where it would not be a concern for similar investments for a similar business in Singapore, Canada, or Brazil?

  • LH

    @Jacob Stokes: one reason it is such a concern in China is that once IP is shared in the form of (say) source code or masks or any other form that makes it easy to duplicate, it is nearly impossible to constrain the use of the IP to whatever is spelled out in the contracts that granted access. For example, the investment might entail creating a Chinese entity that will work in tandem with the foreign company, and grant IP access to this Chinese entity. In practice it is nearly impossible to keep the IP inside that Chinese entity.
    Do you really mean to compare IP protection in China to IP protection in Canada? haha. It is inconceivable that an IP sharing agreement between Alcatel of Canada and Qualcomm would result in the brother-in-law of the chairman of Alcatel getting access to the IP for a new startup he’s doing. Or Alcatel abandoning the agreement altogether, claiming that Qualcomm is a low-quality outfit, and selling the IP in Alcatel products virtually unmodified, claiming it as its own. The latter thing is more or less exactly what happened in a high-profile case involving turbine technology in China.
    -LH

  • LJR

    Is that a joke?….implying a decision to accept investment from China is the same as coming Singapore, Canada or Brazil??

  • Domestic Lawyer

    Awesome post! Interesting info to know.

  • Courtney Brown

    Is the China Investment Fund considering purchasing “New Telecom” of New Zealand after this becomes a separate non protected entity?

  • USL

    Not ready. My fear is that they will take our IP and that we will never get it back. Won’t happen at my company unless I am really desperate.