Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

Patent Litigation In China. The Book. And It Is Good….

Posted in Legal News, Recommended Reading

Though i keep saying this, I will say it again: there are now a number of really good practice-oriented English language books on Chinese law. I can remember not so long ago when people would ask me to recommend books to help them better understand what they needed to know regarding China Law and my answer was always the same: James Zimmerman’s China Law Deskbook. Zimmerman’s book has since been updated and it is still considered to be the best, all-encompasing English language reference book on Chinese law, but now there are all sorts of excellent and more specialized books to supplement it. 

Patent Litigation in China, by Douglas Clark, through the Oxford Press, is yet another such book. This is an excellent book. I actually was not planning to read the whole thing, but (and I know this makes me sound like a nerd), I ended up enjoying it so much that I did.

Neither I nor my firm do any patent work, believing that only lawyers who do it 100% of the time should do it at all. However, as counselors to mostly small and medium sized businesses that do business in and with China and internationally, we find ourselves serving as the nternational law gatekeepers for our clients. By this I mean that they look to us not just for our advice on the areas of law in which we actually practice, but for our assistance in spotting relevant legal issues and referring them to top-tier people even in those areas outside our ken.

Patents is probably the prime example of this.

Virtually every time we get a new client who is doing business in or with China we ask them about their intellectual property. Do you have any trademarks, patents or copyrights, we ask? What about trade secrets? What IP is it important that we protect from theft in China? If they have any patents or if what they are doing sounds as though a patent might make sense, we refer them out to the specialists. But for us even to know when and to whom a referral is warranted, we have to stay at least somewhat current on what goes on in the patent law world.

Patent Litigation in China is good for knowing what is going on in the China patent world and it is great for knowing what to do in that world if you believe someone is infringing on your patent or if someone believes you are infringing on theirs. It is also an excellent book to read just for getting a sense of how China’s courts operate (which as I am always saying, is likely to be quite a bit better than most believe it is, particularly in the context of business litigation involving foreign companies).

This book is very much aimed at the legal practicioner, not the businessperson, but if you are a businessperson imbroiled in a China patent dispute, I recommend this book for you as well. 

I really liked how Clark provides both a solid foundation of China’s relevant patent and patent litigation laws (including a large Appendix section that provides English language English translations of the “Patent Law, the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law, Interpretations by the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues regarding Legal Application in the Adjudication of Patent Infringement Cases; Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court for the Application of Law to Pre-Trial Cessation of Infringement of Patent Right; [and] Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Issues Relating to Application of Law to Adjudication of Cases of Patent Disputes”), along with his own analysis based on real-life experiences. 

The book’s own blurb accurately describes it as follows:

Patent Litigation in China, by Douglas Clark, provides U.S. and other non-Chinese practitioners with an overview of the patent litigation system in China. Strategic commentary is provided to enable those contemplating or involved in patent litigation in China to better comprehend the risks and challenges they face, as well as to ensure better decision-making by those responsible for bringing or defending patent actions. The book covers the tests for patentability grounds for invalidating patents before focusing on evidence gathering, litigation strategy and procedure, as well as considering defenses and remedies. The key differences between the Chinese, U.S. and other more mature patent systems are highlighted throughout the book.
If you are looking for a book that delivers on the above, I highly recommend Patent Litigation in China.
  • http://questionfantasy.blogspot.com/ Baobo

    Is there any discussion about patents becoming irrelevant and unenforceable as technology progresses? It’s short-sighted to ignore the issue. Digital duplication is one thing – soon there will be fabrication machines that can reproduce physical objects.

  • Ben L.

    I too have read this start to finish a few weeks ago. It is a handy reference material to have a number of translated laws and regulations in one place, and the organization is easy to access. Great for legal types.
    I find myself wondering about how the provisions work in actual disputes. Clark notes that, as a civil law system, Chinese courts are not bound by the decisions of others and therefore he did not include many cases. The China’s Anti-Monopoly Law book, also published by Oxford at the same time, included extensive discussion of actual disputes.
    This is not a criticism of the book. I’m merely noting that it is not an encyclopedic reference on Chinese patent litigation the way the China’s Anti-Monopoly Law book is on the AML. Besides, I have my own common law education to to blame for wanting more cases.

  • http://www.foarp.blogspot.com FOARP

    “Is there any discussion about patents becoming irrelevant and unenforceable as technology progresses?”
    Pray tell, where exactly does technological progress render a patent unenforceable? Sure, if you’ve got a patent covering technology which nobody uses any more, you can certainly say that this patent is irrelevant, but I don’t think this is what you are talking about.
    “soon there will be fabrication machines that can reproduce physical objects”
    And how exactly will people protect the inventions that make such machines possible? Or for the technology that will run on such machines? Thought so.
    Let me give you a very simple example – Accenture made a patent application that was published this year for a GUI which allows users to manage multiple cloud computing services with a single click. Since this is cloud computing that we are talking about, it would be easy, if the patent is granted (which seems a distinct possibility in the US at least) for Accenture to see whether their competitors are offering a similar product. Such a granted patent would be both highly relevant and highly enforceable, as are many other similar patents in the area of networking/mobile applications/cloud computing etc. etc. etc.

  • http://douglas-clark.com Doug Clark

    Thanks for your very nice review.
    Ben L’s comment is a good one and I agonised over whether to include more references to cases, ultimately deciding not to (and deleting reference to some I had included in the draft). The ones I included were generally determinative of an issue. I have seen so many decisions made that are at variance with other decisions, I would have either had to include numerous conflicting decisions to show the inconsistency or not include any at all. I chose the latter.