Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

China Halts Theme Park Construction And Why It Matters To You

Posted in Legal News

One of the few things I dislike about my job is putting the kibosh on a project. I have had to do this many times to foreign companies with China projects that are just not legal.

I explain that if the project is illegal under Chinese law, it will always be at risk of being shut down by Beijing, local government guanxi or not. It is our job as lawyers to explain the legal risks and it is the job of our clients to decide what risks to take. 

Our clients usually are not happy to hear that their China project does not comply with China’s laws, but this morning I got an email from a client thanking me for just that. The email is from a company that had retained us to provide legal assistance relating to their involvement in a large Chinese theme park. Just about the first thing we did was to warn this company of how the theme park would be operating illegally unless it secured necessary approvals from Beijing.

When our client sought assurances from its Chinese partners, the Chinese companies responded with the following:

  1. The American company’s lawyers (my law firm) knew nothing about Chinese law.
  2. The American company’s lawyers (my law firm) knew nothing about how China “really” operates.
  3. There is no law saying Beijing must approve these theme parks
  4. The law that requires Beijing approve theme parks is unclear (yes, they did argue both #3 and #4)
  5. The local government is behind the project and so Beijing is irrelevant.

Anything but assured, our client withdrew from the deal.

This client recently thanked us for having steered them clear of what could have been a “major time and money sink” and referred me to a Wall Street Journal article, “China Curbs Theme Park Projects,” explaining Beijing’s recent crack-down on illegal theme parks:

China has suspended the construction of large theme parks to clamp down on local government spending and rein in unauthorized real-estate development.

The country’s top economic planning agency has halted the construction of locally approved parks planned to be larger than 20 hectares or that have a total investment of more than 500 million yuan (US$78 million), according to a directive seen Tuesday.

“Since 2004, the State Council [China's cabinet] has clearly ruled that it must approve construction of large-scale theme parks. But in recent years local governments have approved large parks on their own,” the National Development and Reform Commission said in the directive.

The suspension took effect Aug. 5 and covers projects already approved but for which construction hasn’t yet begun. It will remain in place until the introduction of new regulations for the sector, the directive said.

The suspension comes as Beijing is under growing pressure to clean up the huge amount of debt that local governments have accumulated through infrastructure projects since it launched massive fiscal stimulus in 2008 to combat the global financial crisis.

I particularly love how the article talks of how the law is clear. It is. Take that Chinese companies!

In a previous post, How To Form a China WFOE. Scope Really Really Matters. we talked of how compliance with China’s national laws on Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprises (WFOEs) is essential:

If you take away nothing from this post, please at least understand that your getting local government approval for your WFOE does not mean you are out of the woods. There is little to no benefit in getting approval for a non-conforming [with Beijing] WFOE.

Similarly, in China. Where Everything Is Local. Until It’s Not, we talked of the importance of following China’s national (not just local) laws:

I used to write quite often of the differences in legal enforcement between China’s local governments and Beijing. Most of the time, these posts would conclude wtih our advising foreign businesses in China to get on good terms with their local governments, but to always still realize that being on good terms with their local governments will not insulate them from facing legal problems if they violate China’s national laws.

The Bottom Line: No matter what you hear from your Chinese partners and no matter what you hear from local government (or even national government) officials, if your business is going to be violating Chinese law, you will always be at risk of being shut down. You can choose to take that risk if you wish, but you should never just ignore it.

What do you think?

  • Wally T.

    I am surprised you did not mention how this is part of the trend of Beijing seeking to exert its influence over all businesses. You do agree that is what is happening?

  • Claire

    I’ve read the Wall Street Journal article “China Curbs Theme Park Projects” and am still confused.
    It has been debated that China should have three full sized theme parks. When you say theme park, do mean amusement park?
    If you’re talking about amusement parks, what was the change in the law that you advised your client about?
    If you’re talking about theme parks, would you comment on the Universal Studios joint-venture project which Wen Jiabao decided was not fit for the culture of Beijing?
    It seems that your post does not speak specifically to the subject around which it was constructed.

  • Kim Wedding

    This is typical of what has been going on in many areas of business in China over the last couple of years. I consider this just one more example of Beijing taking over. It wants massive businesses and it wants those businesses to be state owned. It therefore wants to be the approval point for these businesses and woe to the business (Baidu) that seeks to compete with Beijing or goes against what Beijing wants.

  • http://laowaitimes.blogspot.com Mike Cormack

    Good piece, entertaining read. You have a way of illuminating the issues: kudos.

  • AO Kelan

    I think that Beijing has in the last few years stepped it up in terms of exerting its authority and the risks of crossing it by doing something just because the local authorities said you can have increased.

  • chinamike

    I have to agree with Kim and others. This does seem to be about furthering state control across industries.
    See my post on the rise of the SOE vs, Corporate and my post on the rise of the Chinese SOE vs. the Chinese Private company.
    http://www.technomicasia.com/blog/
    Regarding the legal issues. I’m glad you were able to clear this up for them as it did seem like a murky state of affairs.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com Dan

    @Chinamike,
    This story had NOTHING to do with the client you referred to us. I have yet to talk with them. This was a completely different company for whom we did some work many months ago. It’s funny but we actually have represented a handful of American companies involved with Chinese theme parks. Most of those companies cut their teeth at places like Disney and Great America.

  • chinamike

    Wow, that is just weird. Sorry your current client had to shut down.

  • Hua Qiao

    The South Morning Post a few days ago mentioned the fact that Beijing banned the building of new golf courses in 2004. That law still applies. I would estimate that golf courses have easily doubled and probably quadrupled since that time. The article says there were 3 in 1994 and now there are over 130. By the way, they are classified as parks so as to be politically correct.
    So, what would you suggest to a western golf course developer? I know, you will have to say you will need to review the facts and study the ban, etc etc.
    It is just not as simple as you say. Inconsistent interpretation by local enforcement agencies makes for substanital confusion.
    To this day, using your own example, there is no clear definintion of what a local government financing platform is. Definitions and metrics vary depending on if you talk to the CBRC, or MOFCOM or the NDRC. Even varies from CBRC Branch to CBRC branch. Getting something classified as commercial (as opposed to LGFP) by regulators in Shanghai or Guangdong is easier than the same thing reviewed by Beijing authorities.
    Think about it. How would you define this, given the fact that provinces and cities have their own SASACs that engage in all kinds of commercial activities? Loan officers in China will always look first at policy risk when reviewing a deal in order to try to assess whether a particular borrower will be adversely subjected to the arbitrary and sometime capricious interpretation of policies by officials.

  • John

    Did that mentioned government clampdown on theme park construction affect Universal Studios, as well?
    http://www.thethemeparkguy.com/board/universal-studios-beijing/