Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

China’s Campaign Against Corruption

Posted in China Business

By: Steve Dickinson

Earlier this month the PRC National Audit Office 审计署 issued its first two reports of the year. Report 1 provides the results of a major audit of state owned agencies and banks conducted at the request of the National People’s Congress. Report 2 details 28 court cases involving fraud uncovered during the audits. These reports have been published in conjunction with the central government’s current campaign to demonstrate that the problem of official corruption is being addressed. The very public display of these reports is part of a similar campaign for transparency in government affairs.

Report 1 provides the following statistics on the results of the audit campaign:

• RMB 122.3 billion in assets were recovered.

• RMB 7.7 billion in losses were averted.

• RMB 48.2 billion in irregularities were corrected.

• 1103 people received administrative punishment.

• 104 people were referred for criminal prosecution, with 95 convictions to date.

Report 2 provides a brief report on 28 “typical” matters that were referred for prosecution. These involved the following bad acts:

• Obtaining loans from government owned banks on false pretenses. The most common method was using real property as security for loans where no such property exists. More complex schemes involved creating entirely fake business divisions.

• Converting government owned property to private use/using loan funds for personal projects.

• A common theme involves government relief payments. The standard scheme is to create a group of fake residents and then having payments due to such residents paid into the corrupt official’s bank account(s).

The extensive government funded construction in China is a fertile ground for corruption. A standard scheme works as follows: an officer is in charge of a construction project. He hires a friend to act as general contractor. The general contractor bills for the work at an inflated price. The two share in the illegal profit. The report discusses this sort of scheme as well.

The issuance of these reports is a good news/bad news event.

On the good news side, Report 1 shows that the central government is taking strong steps to rid government, banks and state owned enterprises of financial corruption. Report 2 breaks with tradition and lists the full names of the defendants and provides full details of the fraudulent activities, making clear that the government is serious about transparency. On the bad news side, the amount of corruption and fraud uncovered is a tiny fraction of the almost endemic fraud that pervades Chinese government, banking and business. Most Chinese, when reading this report, extrapolate out to what they see as the real magnitude of the problem. The result is a feeling of concern rather than a feeling of accomplishment.

There are two messages here for foreign companies doing business in China. First, be on guard at all times against fraud within your own company and in connection with those with whom you do business. Second, avoid getting involved in this kind of activity at all costs. Though the chance of discovery and prosecution may be small, the chance is real and I can assure you that you will not enjoy a 14 year stay in a Chinese jail.  

  • PA

    Is this really a new story. Doesn’t Beijing announce these sorts of things all the time (especially when the natives are getting restless) and then end up not doing much of anything at all about it? Do you really believe this time is going to be different?

  • Bob

    Yeah…but how do you know that the Audit Office’s reports are “Real”? What if they’re in some way “fake”, or made for some other purpose?
    How do they use “real” property that doesn’t exist to obtain a bank loan? Do they have a way to get a fake Fangchan Zheng, and make a bogus entry in the Property Title Registration system? How?

  • Geronimo

    Rule of Law in China — “Is the glass half empty, is it half full? Either way it’s radioactive. So don’t drink it.”

  • Twofish

    PA: Doesn’t Beijing announce these sorts of things all the time (especially when the natives are getting restless) and then end up not doing much of anything at all about it.
    I think things are happening. Business owners that I know say that this year as in year’s past, they are having to give new year’s red packets to officials, but over the last several years the size of the packets have gotten a lot smaller as officials are getting more and more nervous about asking for too much.

  • Sino Man

    Corruption is so ingrained in China I do not see it ever going away.

  • Twofish

    The social etiquette of Chinese gift giving is odd, and one the more interesting positions to be in is to be in a position of authority when someone offers you a gift. It’s considered offensive to refuse a gift, which puts officials in a rather awkward positions when you really don’t want the red packet, but someone is literally forcing cash down your pocket. And by literally, I mean they are literally putting their hand in your pocket while you are trying physically to force the money back into their hands.
    Part of the problem is that when you say “no, I really don’t want the money” people think that you are being humble, and it’s really hard to say “no, I really don’t want the money.” If you say “I can’t take this money because it’s against the rules” the person that is stuffing the packet down your pocket will insist that it’s not a bribe or that there is no bad meaning to it, and if you imply that it is a bribe then you really offend the person that is giving you the gift.
    At our company, and what we’ve been told is that if a client absolutely insists on handing you a gift that is above a certain limit, then you should contact compliance. At this point, you are usually allowed to accept the gift, and turn it over to compliance, who then will donate it to charity.