Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

Cambodia: China’s Newest Appendage?

Posted in China Business, China Travel

Co-bloogger Steve Dickinson just returned from a business trip to Cambodia. As China’s costs rise, American and European companies are beginning to turn to Vietnam, and to a lesser extent, Cambodia, and even Laos, for their manufacturing outsourcing. This post focuses on Steve’s time in Cambodia, and, specifically on its growing relationship with China.

By Steve Dickinson

I just returned from Cambodia. On this trip, I stayed in Phnom Penh and explored the city carefully for the first time. There are a number of notable changes from the last time I was there, about a year and a half ago:

• The Cambodian government has worked hard to develop the riverfront area. Though the rest of the city remains in a state of remarkable disrepair, the parks and riverfront along the Mekong and Tonle Sap have been entirely modernized. The locals have taken to the modern park-like atmosphere and have made the waterfront a local hang-out, especially on mornings and weekends. This is in marked contrast to the old days, where the riverfront was mostly relegated to tourists.

• Most of the current development seems to be highly dependent on Chinese (Hong Kong/Mainland/Singapore) investment. The visible, modern developments in Phnom Penh all seem to be based on Chinese money. The locals even claim that their new parliament building and prime minister’s office were funded by the Chinese. On a larger scale, the Chinese and Cambodian governments on November 4 announced that China had agreed to invest $USD1.6 billion on infrastructure projects in Cambodia over the next five years.

• Cambodia has become a center for outsourcing of textiles. Conditions in this business seem to have improved. When I was last in Cambodia, five of the textile factories in Phnom Penh were on strike. The strikes were all directed at mainland Chinese employers. This worker unrest seems to have passed and on this visit all the factories were operating at full capacity. Cambodia has a small but skilled workforce, primarily composed of young women from the countryside. The government plan is to move more aggressively into outsource-focused manufacturing. The major limitation is the supply of electricity. During my visit I had talks with several consultants who are working on electricity issues throughout S.E. Asia. The problem for Cambodia is that it has no good locations for hydro-power. The Chinese are rumored to be planning a major power plant project in Cambodia as part of the investment program discussed above. The mystery is what will be used to fuel the proposed power plant. Cambodia has no coal resources, no coal port and no coal transport infrastructure. So the building of a power plant requires consideration of all these infrastructure issues.

• The Cambodians I talked with appear to have accepted that their economy will become dominated by China. If true, this would mean that China has successfully moved to dominate Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar in S.E. Asia. The presence of the Chinese is greeted by the locals with indifference. There is very little evidence of any real interest in Cambodia by any other country, so the impression given by the locals is consistent with the facts on the ground. From the standpoint of the Cambodians, Thailand and Viet Nam are their traditional enemies. Alliance with China is seen as a way to keep those traditional enemies at bay. This is in stark contrast with Viet Nam which is moving closer to the United States, in large part as a counter to China. 

• During my stay, Prime Minister Hun Sen announced a plan to close down the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal and terminate trials of the remaining Khmer Rouge. This was a topic of interest in the foreign NGO community. The locals greeted the news with indifference.

• During my stay, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was also present in Phnom Penh. Her visit was not mentioned on local television or in the local newspapers. The Cambodians I spoke with stated that they feel the U.S. has written off Cambodia as an investment target. In particular, they see the close relations of the U.S. with Viet Nam and Thailand as a threat to Cambodia. As a result, Ms. Clinton’s visit was treated as a non-event.

• I took a number of visits into rural villages. In the area around Phnom Penh there is definitely a feeling that more money is moving into the rural economy. The people are starting to paint their houses and they are moving from wood construction to concrete. These are the usual signs of rural wealth. The birthrate in the country side is high, which means there will no doubt be plenty of laborers down the road to work in the textile, shoe and furniture factories being planned for the Phnom Penh area. Let’s hope they get the electricity situation figured out by the time these kids are ready to go to work.

• I visited for the first time the National Museum in Phnom Penh. This museum houses most of the fragile sculpture from the Angkor Wat temple complexes. This museum is one of the best I have been to in Asia and is well worth a visit. It is very laid back, like the rest of Cambodia. The exhibits, however, are world class.

• My overall impression is that Cambodia is not trying to compete with Viet Nam for American business, nor would it be likely to succeed if it did.  At this point, most foreign direct investment in Cambodia is coming from China and from overseas Chinese and I do not see that changing in the shot term. 

What are you seeing out there?

  • Tee

    China’s presence in Cambodia is strong! Even more strong is the newly arrived Chinese immigrants from mainland China and will continue to grow!

  • A Different Steve

    I have been doing business with Cambodia, on a fairly low level, for going on five years now and I too have been seeing what Steve saw. China and the Chinese are starting to dominate the business picture and the Cambodians of all social strata seem pretty impervious to this. I just wonder if some day they will wake up and feel otherwise or if some day something big will happen that will cause them to feel otherwise. Until that happens though, as an American who does business there, I suspect that my frustration with the country is only going to increase.

  • http://www.chinatranslated.com Duncan

    It’s interesting you don’t mention the Koreans at all. I gather the Koreans were by far and away the biggest drivers of FDI in Cambodia (especially in the real estate and industrial sectors) before the 2008-09 crisis.

  • Tim F.

    I spent last year in Cambodia and what you are describing regarding the Chinese is true. They are coming into Cambodia in large doses and nobody seems to care.

  • Steve

    Duncan: Good point about the Koreans. Earlier in this decade, it is correct that the Koreans were the main driver of investment in Cambodia. They were especially visible in luxury resort projects throughout the country. On this trip, it appeared to me that the Koreans have almost completely withdrawn. Most of the luxury projects remain uncompleted and there seems to be very little Korean participation in the manufacturing sector. I have no information on the reason for the change. I suspect that the reason is that Cambodia turned out not be be a very good investment target for the private Korean companies. Chinese investment comes from the state, so they don’t need to worry about investment returns.

  • http://cambodianlaw.wordpress.com/ David

    Interesting observations. While I agree that China’s influence and investment is certainly growing in Cambodia, you’ve really overstated the degree.
    While the Chinese have announced several substantial infrastructure investments, the most visible construction in Phnom Penh is not Chinese-funded, but Korean (Gold Tower 42, CamKo City…). To say there’s “very little evidence of any real interest in Cambodia by any other country” ignores the dominance of Korean and Vietnamese firms, as well as the huge role foreign aid has played in keeping the country running.
    To say the current government is courting the Chinese to keep their Vietnamese “traditional enemies” at bay ignores the close relationship, some would say dominance, between Hanoi and Cambodia.
    Also, there were huge garment sector strikes a couple of months ago, and the dispute is still simmering. Untrue to say the “unrest seems to have passed”.
    Sure, this is China’s backyard, and its influence is certainly on the rise – but Cambodia is nowhere near an appendage to China.

  • Hoang Shi Vuang

    It’s difficult to be an appendage when you have other countries stuck inbetween. Cambodia has no border with China. You’re also just as likely to see decent French investments there as Chinese, and Indochine still resonates. If Steve spoke any French he might have got a different viewpoint than the typical ‘American from China’ poking around, his view is distorted. And according to the Council for the Development of Cambodia, inbound FDI from China dropped by 50% in the past 12 months. Most investment came in from ASEAN, and Singapore especially.

  • http://www.sanfernandovalleylawyers.com Joseph Marchelewski@yahoo.com

    Why is China taking such an expensive interest in Cambodia?

  • Tom

    yes most Projects are Korean funded but many projects like Koh Pich, Boeung Kak, etc. are local Ethnic Chinese owned corp.! I as a Cambodian would like to see more Chinese coming to our country! More Chinese means to balance the Vietnamese from getting closer to Cambodia! I don’t mind either if China makes Cambodia it’s province!

  • Shianouk

    Hardly its an appendage.
    1) Cambodia doesn’t share any border with China;
    2) Cambodia doesn’t have a Double Tax Treaty with China;
    3) China isn’t even among Cambodia’s top five trading partners;
    4) Cambodia is a constitutional, democratic Monarchy.
    I think you need to do more fieldwork before making such comments.

  • Another Steve

    Shianouk,
    Who are you anyway? 1) The article does not say Cambodia is an appendage to China. It merely raised the question on this. 2) It doesn’t matter whether Cambodia shares a border with China. Have you never heard of colonialism? 3) So what if Cambodia doesn’t have a Double Tax Treaty with China. That is not in any way the issue here; 3) China is one of Cambodia’s 4) The United Nations lists China as Cambodia’s second largest trading partner so I think you just made that up about how China isn’t in the top five. http://data.un.org/CountryProfile.aspx?crName=Cambodia. 5) Cambodia is not a democracy so you made that up too.
    I don’t know who you are but you are full of shit.

  • Tee

    This is to the Shianouk guy! China is NOW CAMBODIA’S TOP TRADING AND BIGGEST AID DONOR! Did you hear that they just signed 6.4 billion dollar deal this month for the next 5 years and this is just the beginning! Cambodia is considered China’s backyard! China is even building a new city in Koh Kong Cambodia worth 5 billion dollar!
    http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90883/7189135.html

  • Just Been There

    I just got back from a fact-finding mission to Cambodia for my company (a mid-sized company based in Britain). We have decided we are not going to be investing in Cambodia (we are choosing Vietnam instead) and the main reason for our decision was the sense that Cambodia has become so focused on China and China so focused on Cambodia that we as a British company would always be viewed as a precarious afterthought.
    I do not believe those who are trying to downplay China’s large and rapidly expanding role in Cambodia have been there recently or else they have some sort of political agenda that is causing them to make things up.

  • Tee

    I and the rest of the Cambodians don’t mine at all if China make Cambodia it’s satellite province!