Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

Spies Among Your China Employees? It’s Possible. Your Other Employees? That’s Possible Too.

Posted in China Business

The New York Times is out with a story today, entitled, “U.S. Companies Are at Risk of Spying by Their Own Workers.” It is a fascinating and downright chilling story. Though there will no doubt be many who believe the story is over-dramatic, I think it actually grossly understates the problem. 

The article discusses various instances where Chinese employees of United States companies engaged in espionage for the Chinese government. According to the article, espionage against U.S. companies is on the increase and not just by China:

As China and other countries broaden their efforts to obtain Western technology, American industries beyond the traditional military and high-tech targets risk having valuable secrets exposed by their own employees, court records show.

Rather than relying on dead drops and secret directions from government handlers, the new trade in business secrets seems much more opportunistic, federal prosecutors say, and occurs in loose, underground markets throughout the world.

Prosecutors say it is difficult to prove links to a foreign government, but intelligence officials say China, Russia and Iran are among the countries pushing hardest to obtain the latest technologies.

“In the new global economy, our businesses are increasingly targets for theft,” said Lanny A. Breuer, the assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department’s criminal division. “In order to stay a leader in innovation, we’ve got to protect these trade secrets.”

Other than once consulting for attorneys defending Chinese-Americans charged with selling company secrets, I am NOT directly or even indirectly (other than through the media) of any incidents of government espionage.

But, I am aware of at least a half dozen cases where clients have caught employees engaging in information peddling. I will briefly describe three of them:

1. An employee of a very successful international food company was passing all sorts of information from my client to a company in Vietnam. The employee doing this is a Caucasian born and raised in the United States. My client became suspicious and then examined his computer.

2. An employee of another international food company was caught sending trade secrets to a company in Russia. This was back when faxes were the thing and this person left a telling fax in a copy machine. The company for whom he worked was primarily Russian. This was back when it was relatively easy to secure access to someone’s bank account information and we did so and saw payments we believed were coming from the competitor. Again, the perpetrator was someone (not of Russian descent) born and raised in the United States. 

3. A computer company (I am being intentionally vague here) learned of an employee who was giving out trade secret information to a competitor. We then realized that this employee had downloaded key information onto his laptop. We contacted the local police to try to get them to secure the return of the company laptop containing the trade secret information. The police (wrongly) insisted it was a civil problem. Again, American born and raised.

4.  I fairly recently helped to oversee a case for a Chinese company whose Chinese-American employee had used the company’s buyer list to start his own business.

5.  We have had two cases where our clients entered into joint venture deals with Chinese companies that were very different from the deals our clients (who were not represented by my firm at the time) thought they were entering. In both instances, they blamed (and fired) their Chinese employee for having lied to them about the nature of the deal and in both instances it did appear that the employee was working on behalf of the Chinese company in the joint venture while on the payroll of the American company.   

I could go on and on.

The point of this post is NOT to say that any Chinese employee could be a spy and it is NOT to say that the kinds of thefts described above rise to the level of espionage, because they do not. No, the point of this post is to highlight that the risk of your employees (no matter what their nationality or ethnicity) selling your company secrets is always there, no matter how big or small your business and no matter what your industry.  

What do you think?

  • http://www.artcovery.com Cris Stringfellow

    I agree that spying can go either way, however, it seems to me that China has a more organised and deliberate state-run approach to spy networks than ‘us’ – Western, English-speaking countries. Perhaps we should adopt a similar approach, but I believe that would be difficult given out differing values — individualism v collectivism, and the difficulty of individuals feeling a super-strong allegiance to a national institution. I have encountered overseas Chinese nationals who have been approached by these Chinese state spy networks, and declined the offer, despite good money being tabled. So it is clearly there, and it be more extensive used than in the West, but not all Chinese people buy into this activity, having various ethical/personal reservations.

  • Chris

    ‘Spying is a fairly unfair description of most of the behaviour you described in the examples given (many of which were the theft of commercial information for personal advantage or in the pay of another company). It looks far less like State ochestrated behaviour and far more like plain of theft of commercial secrets by staff who are planning to go into business for themselves or to earn another income stream from a competitor. Interestingly enough, many of the examples you provide are of expatriate staff stealing information and know-how.
    This type of theft by staff is sadly very common in China. Customer lists, Contract samples etc, all developed at great expense frequently taken by sales staff leaving to either start their own business or to work for a competitor.
    This is unprofessional and a violation of employment Contract etc, but not quite spying in the cloak and dagger sense.

  • Jim

    Pointing out that the employee/spies were American born and raised is missing the point. The extent of the problem would greatly diminish if Iran/China/Russia were not aggressively seeking this information.
    Maybe the answer to the problem is to pay employees who have access to sensitive information more money, and to educate them during orientation about how helping out the competition will ultimately damage their own earnings and career prospects by damaging the company they are legitimately working for. And it’s not like the theiving company is going to jump at the chance to hire a turncoat.

  • Caroline

    Why do you say that the incidents you describe do not rise to the level of espionage? What more is necessary to rise to that level?

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com Dan

    @Cris Stringfellow,
    I am not for a moment condoning Chinese espionage, but I also do not for a moment believe all sorts of Western companies (the United States and France are known for this) are not doing the exact same thing. This is what powerful countries do, like it or not.
    Of course you are right about how not all Chinese buy into this. You mention Chinese being approached to do this for money; I am guessing others are approached and told to do this for nationalism.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com Dan

    Chris,
    I completely agree with you and that is why I made clear (or so I thought) that the examples I gave were NOT espionage. I gave them to show that the company that believes it need only be on the lookout for this sort of thing just from their Chinese employees is a company not sufficiently watching out for itself. To a company, the stealing of trade secrets is the stealing of trade secrets and, in most instances, it matters little who actually took the trade secrets and more where they end up.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com Dan

    @ Jim,
    Yes, that is true, and it would be great if there were no government spying, but that is not the reality nor do I ever expect that to change. Iran/China/Russia are aggressively seeking this information from Western companies, but I am betting the United States has its own network of spies out there as well. In fact, I kinda hope we do. Also, France has become somewhat notorious for this.
    All I am saying is that this problem is not confined to any one ethnicity, or even three and the threat of trade secret theft comes not just from governments.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com Dan

    @ Caroline,
    I have always thought espionage requires a state actor and in none of the examples I gave was I aware of any involvement of a state actor, Though in hindsight, it certainly would not surprise me a bit if Vietnam was at least somewhat behind the one case I mention involving that country.

  • unlike

    Unlike free governments, the Chinese state has much more control over the lives of its citizens (in China), and thus indirectly threaten Chinese living abroad through many different ways. So it is not related to ethnicity, but rather to the government system which makes Chinese abroad much more vulnerable to pressure from the Chinese government.

  • HI

    “but I am betting the United States has its own network of spies out there as well.”
    Why? The United States generally seeks military and strategic information. I’m unaware of any reports of the U.S. conducting economic espionage and handing over the information to national champions (i.e. companies like Boeing or GM). Not only that, but to anyone familiar with U.S. corporations that sounds like a laughable assertion. There’s a huge difference between diplomatic and military data on one hand, and trade secrets on the other.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com Dan

    @HI,
    I am personally aware of at least three instances where the U.S. government has essentially done the bidding of private businesses against foreign companies. In two cases, they went after foreign companies on pretty much nothing more than the word of large U.S. companies and in the end charges were dropped against both foreign companies. In the third case, the government gave my U.S. client extremely helpful information garnered from a foreign company “under investigation.” Not sure if it would be fair to say that any of these cases involved spying, but if you don’t think the U.S. government is out there shilling in every way it can for U.S. companies, than I laugh at you. In fact, as a proud American, I wouldn’t have it any other way. I just cannot get all up in arms when China is out there trying to steal our technology because I see that as something countries do. Heck, if I were to get all mad about this sort of thing, I’d be more likely to get mad at a country like France since they are at least a clear ally of us and they are pretty famous for just this sort of thing.

  • HI

    “In two cases, they went after foreign companies on pretty much nothing more than the word of large U.S. companies and in the end charges were dropped against both foreign companies. In the third case, the government gave my U.S. client extremely helpful information garnered from a foreign company “under investigation.”"
    I understand why you have to be vague, but your examples as described could be perfectly consistent with a legitimate investigation of trade secret theft or economic espionage by a Chinese company or employee. If I catch an employee or competitor spying, I would sure hope the government would start an investigation based on my word, and not require some independent confirmation from an unbiased third party. These cases are difficult to prove, and just because the charges were dropped doesn’t mean there was no crime committed. And as a victim, I’d sure hope the government would update me on what’s going on with the case, and I’d find that information extremely helpful.
    There’s a world of difference between what I describe above, and taking technical information submitted to a regulatory agency for certification and handing it over to local competitors so they can copy the technology, or breaking into computer systems to hoover up trade secrets. Things that the Chinese do routinely.
    From your vague language, it’s hard to tell whether anything improper happened in those three cases.