Chinese Branding. From Moribund To ....?
As just about everyone knows by now, Chinese companies are generally not terribly good at marketing and sales, particularly in the United States. For every Haier or Lenovo, there have to be at least ten thousand Chinese companies with good products with no really differentiation from their competitors. How many of you living outside China can in two minutes or less name even five Chinese companies.
Those of us who do work for Chinese companies are constantly bemoaning the difficulty in getting Chinese companies to listen to us as to what it takes to do business in the United States. We see our Chinese clients failing to fulfill their promise in the United States and it greatly frustrates us. For some common reasons for these failures, check out this post, "Ten Reasons Chinese Companies Fail In The United States."
So when I read today's Wall Street Journal article, "Chinese Firm Meets Global Branding," I was beaming for two reasons. First, with a bit of "hey I know those guys" pride, and second, with a bit of relief that there may in fact be some light at the end of the proverbial tunnel.
The article is about a Chinese company called Changzhou Asian Endergonic Electronic Technology Company, which had the good sense to listen to its U.S. advisors and re-name itself Züuma(pronounced zoo-ma) for the U.S. market. Now before you laugh, let me stress this is no small feat. A few years ago, I worked on a joint venture deal that made complete sense but never took off because the Chinese company refused to market its home products in the United States using anything other than its own completely unpronounceable Chinese name, right during the zenith of the Chinese pet food scandal.
Züuma (I have to confess I am not a big fan of the umlaot, but I'm guessing they are using it to convey German-ness/Swedish-ness) has been making GPS mounts and selling them to North American and European importers who market them under their own brands. Züuma makes about 40 cents off each mount, which typically sell for about $30 at retail.
Züuma's owner, Jack Yang, was smart enough to realize that if his company was to greatly increase its profit margins it would need to develop its own brand in the United States and, more importantly, that it would need to bring on top-notch American assistance to accomplish that. As Mr. Yang himself put it, he lacked the necessary knowledge of the U.S. market to conquer it on his own:
"It's not that small- and medium-sized Chinese companies don't want to develop global brands," he [Jack Yang] said in a phone interview in Chinese. "We don't know how. We don't understand the U.S. market, culture or business model."
Yang ended up using Scott Markman of Chicago advertising agency Monogram Group, to help him "create his own brand and to get a richer margin." I have known Scott for years and we have spoken more than once about what Chinese companies must begin doing if they are to succeed in the United States.
Markman pulled no punches with Yang, telling him, "You're very passionate about your product, your invention. Why make such a small margin?" Yang bought into the idea and Markman then brought on Michael Zakkour (with whom I have had similar conversations about Chinese companies developing as viable international businesses), managing director of China BrightStar, a China-sourcing company, to oversee marketing and distribution. To get around Mr. Yang's reluctance to pay full American rates, "Messrs. Markman and Zakkour reduced their fees and agreed to take a commission based on units sold."
The WSJ article then talks about the Americans jousting with Mr. Yang regarding the Americans putting long term goals over the short term profits Mr. Yang seems to crave, leaving readers to think the jury may still be out on this relationship. But hey, it is a start and I know that Scott and Michael have the U.S. expertise combined with the China knowledge to pull it out.
In my experience working with Korean and Russian companies, their willingness to do the right things to succeed in the United States pretty much went from "no" to "yes" without all that much forewarning. I always describe it as being like a light going from off to on.
So maybe the light for Chinese companies has not yet been pressed, but this story at least lets me know that they at least realize they are in darkness.

Comments (20)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endTwofish - July 26, 2010 10:36 PM
> Chinese companies are generally not terribly good at marketing and sales, particularly in the
> United States.
I don't think this is true at all. If you are an OEM in Guangdong, the best sales and marketing strategy may be to just manufacture product and then ship to a US company that handles branding, advertising, and distribution. As long as you are making money in a sustainable way, you have good sales and marketing even if you don't have flashy ads on every street corner and no one has any idea who manufactures the product.
People often forget that the purpose of running a business is to make money. You can make money with low margin anonymous businesses. Also some of the times the correct business strategy to dealing with the difficulties of doing business in the United States or China or Zambia, is not to do business there. Before a Chinese business starts doing business in the US, they really have to ask the question, they do you want to do business in the US? It's not as if there is a lack of untapped markets in China. If you do business *anywhere* new, then you have to be prepared to spend large amounts of money with the high possibility of failure even if you do everything right.
> "You're very passionate about your product, your invention. Why make such a small margin?"
Why not?
Something that every business owner has to be careful about is these sorts of appeals.
Also one common factor is that a lot of these "you must do this to break into the American market" is that they are basically commercials by professional service groups selling services to Chinese companies. Nothing wrong with that, but business relationships are a lot like marriages. Sometimes they work. Sometimes they don't. A lot of times it's really hard to figure out why they work and why they don't.
I do expect that in a year or two, you'll have a lot of messy divorces as you have a lot of Chinese companies screaming about how they paid large amounts of money to company X, Y, or Z and things still blew apart.
Green Hat - July 26, 2010 11:49 PM
I think this is a load of codswallop. Chinese companies are very strong at branding themselves in China and across Asia, Africa, Middle East and Latin America. Chinese executives regularly travel abroad far more than their American counterparts do. Its US business that is rubbish at marketing itself in China, not the other way around. Just look at the trade deficit and ask why you can't get brands like Reeces Pieces in Shanghai. You're way off the mark here.
the running man - July 27, 2010 12:06 AM
If only someone could develop an app that measures opportunity costs. The world would be a better place.
I guess China has a little trouble commanding loyalty outside its borders? So the question is, are they willing to earn it for a change? It's their opportunity to lose.
Me, I'm not holding my breath. I can't play golf, so I might say it's a frivolous game. Tell myself it's a choice, when it's really inability.
I may be mistaken, but the vast amount of Chinese businesspeople I've met seem to have a similar attitude for business cultures outside their own. Hence the need for special research where China business is concerned. People phrase it in neat culturally-relativistic terms but what it really means is that international norms are too subtle -and accountable - for an average rote-educated Chinese to employ, so you have to use kid gloves, one cash transaction at a time, and blow sunshine up his *.
I will care about China business success when Chinese generally start employing Win-Win attitudes beyond lip service. (Sorry for my candor).
Chris - July 27, 2010 12:37 AM
> Chinese companies are generally not terribly good at marketing and sales, particularly in the
> United States.
Agree that many Chinese companies are not great at sales and marketing in the USA. The investment too daunting...
However, most Chinese enterprises with substantial domestic businesses operate very sophisticated branding, marketing and sales operations in China. The better even extend that to quite good after sales service. Don't underestimate how difficult a market China is to crack. Domestic enterprises focused on local markets have had to learn many difficult lessons related to setting up legal entities across provincial and municipal boundaries, establishing logistics and warehousing, building distribution channels and building brand and markets. I can see very rapid experimentation in channel distribution (direct, digital, own brand retail, and external retail) as manufacturers attempt to expand their margins and control of brands in very crowded channels.
Due to relatively low cost in domestic markets, most sales and marketing functions are conducted in-house and most enterprises unused to outsourcing to 3rd party consultants.
Those lessons will position them well when they finally decide to make the big jump into managing brand, distribution and channel in international markets. The sheer brutality and competitiveness of the domestic market has given Chinese enterprises a clear understanding of how to move up the value chain and maximise share of retail price.
Yes there are differences in the US and other international markets. Yes Chinese enterprises will need to invest heavily to ensure branding, translation, sales and marketing etc are conducted by professionals with an understanding of those markets. However, the basics are already well understood within those enterprises.
I think too many foreign enterprises look solely at OEM outfits that have no domestic or international sales & marketing capacity or resources and see no competitive threat. There are many other strong local enterprises that are either primarily domestically focused, or run local business but OEM for global markets that will emerge as strong competitors moving forward.
Klaus - July 27, 2010 12:54 AM
Hi Dan! Thanks for a great blog!
However, I have to tell you that umlaut is not a character which is used in Sweden.
Klaus
Harry C. - July 27, 2010 1:39 AM
My working with Chinese companies has made me a pessimist. I do not believe anything but a very few Chinese companies will ever become truly international, at least not in my lifetime.
tfm - July 27, 2010 1:53 AM
Eventually, Chinese companies will learn, just as Japanese and Korean companies did. I think the learning process has already started, tentatively, and that's what this article shows. It will not be immediate, it will be by fits and starts and those out front in helping the Chinese are going to go crazy.
Joyce - July 27, 2010 2:34 AM
I did a tour of about 20 consumer-orientated businesses in Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta. The hardware was amazing -- giant buildings and gleaming new facilities.
The software was not there.
One complex cost several 100 million USD. And yet they hadn't figured out their website.
One area had no brochures. Another had no place to buy food or water (with several thousand visitors a day). Another had no transport link or taxi stand. One rainy night, crowds were stuck miserably under an awning.
There is a lack of understanding about the "soft" side of business -- like customer service, or relating your brand to a cool or pleasurable experience.
Luxury goods and services are new to Chinese consumers, so maybe they're not so picky. But if you offered that service at a top U.S. facility, you'd lose your shirt.
Chinese companies market themselves well domestically -- but it's usually through a sort of guanxi-relationship with local promoters or press. Anything with state money will probably get a blindly positive "review". Overseas, it doesn't work like that. Critics and customers can be brutal. Foreign companies are used to spending a big chunk of their budgets on consumer research and branding.
Many of the expensive new operations I visited had no PR or Marketing team. (Those that did hired Hong Kong or foreign consultants). Otherwise, staff could not answer simple questions or do simple tasks.
@ Twofish is right that an anonymous manufacturer with no advertising, PR or marketing can still make money.
But someday (soon, I think) China will develop into something more sophisticated than the world's cheap workshop.
If it can figure out the "soft" stuff, it will be able to produce top technology, brands and services globally.
Twofish - July 27, 2010 4:00 AM
http://seekingalpha.com/article/184688-chinese-companies-can-t-build-brands-think-again
This is pretty consistent with what I'm seeing. When Chinese companies go overseas, their first destination is Latin America and the Middle East.
> Those of us who do work for Chinese companies are constantly bemoaning the difficulty in
> getting Chinese companies to listen to us as to what it takes to do business in the United
> States.
The problem with "advice" is that right now it's not obvious whether any of it will work or not. If you can present some success stories (or failure stories), this will turn heads, but right now the idea that you can make it in the US by branding is an idea that is totally unproven. The example of Zuuma is a case in point. Right now, it is work in progress, and it may very well fail for a thousand different reasons. It will be interesting to see what happens in three years, but right now it is far, far, far premature to describe it as a "success story."
And then there is the question of why a Chinese company should try to market it's products directly in the US at all? You have a domestic market that is growing like crazy, and all sorts of untapped global markets which are much easier pickings.
lucane - July 27, 2010 6:07 AM
Green Hat, have you lost your mind?
Yes, Americans have done horrible at branding in China - that is why the Chinese don't love to buy Nike, drive Buick / Ford / Chevy, or eat at KFC and McDonalds. And the Chinese are so awesome at international branding, that is why us Americans love to wear our LiNing shirts and sport our Rich Boss shoes. I know that every time I am in NYC that I love to eat some Chinese food at Wish Doing and stop by to shop at the Cache Cache.
You've clearly got it all figured out.
Twofish - July 27, 2010 8:07 AM
For every US company that has done well in China branding, you can name about three or four that either haven't tried or have failed pretty horribly. General Motors is a fascinating example because it has far more brand equity in China than it does in the US. McDonalds and KFC have done well. Burger King and Church's have not.
Also one important point is that US brands often have done well in the China market because they got in before there was any competition. GM, KFC, McDonald's, and Nike were in China long before most of the current Chinese companies existed, and getting to the point where Chinese companies can compete in brands in China is a major step.
The other point is that one truism is that you have to have established brands at home, before you even hope to have any chance of making it overseas. Haier, Tsingtao, and Legend were both extremely strong brands in China before they even tried to expand overseas, This is why I'm not optimistic about Zuuma's prospects, and why I think that creating a brand for the purpose of entering the US market is a losing strategy for Chinese companies.
One other point here is that I don't think that Chinese companies have generally failed to create international brands out of ignorance. It's just that creating an international brand is a hugely expensive process, and most Chinese companies have decide (I think correctly) that they are better off putting their effort elsewhere. If you are a Chinese company in China, then I don't see the point in trying to expand in the US which isn't growing economically rather putting your effort in trying to expand in China that is growing at 10%/year.
Green Hat - July 27, 2010 5:22 PM
@Lucane - No I haven't lost my mind and neither have the Chinese.Chinese companies sell components to the US while the US corp. has all the expense and hassle of branding in the domestic market. American cars for example are stuffed full of Chinese components. So no need for Chinese branding ha ha ha.
Chris - July 27, 2010 7:47 PM
@ Joyce: "Chinese companies market themselves well domestically -- but it's usually through a sort of guanxi-relationship with local promoters or press. Anything with state money will probably get a blindly positive "review". Overseas, it doesn't work like that. Critics and customers can be brutal. Foreign companies are used to spending a big chunk of their budgets on consumer research and branding."
While the China PR side of things is often paid placement in State Owned media, Chinese consumers markets are tough. There are very large numbers of experienced, qualified and very, very savvy Chinese sales and marketing professionals focused on domestic consumer markets. Visit a mix of large malls, wholesale markets, average street shops, large supermarkets and, most importantly online sites to see the vast effort and investment going into domestic sales.
Every foreign enterprise in China focused on the domestic market is experiencing tough competition. None of the senior sales and marketing execs at those companies would consider their Chinese competitors to be as naive or incompetent as some commentators above make out. All foreign enterprises are watching as key market segments slip into the hands of domestic competitors. This would suggest that Chinese sales and marketing operations are being significantly underestimated.
I manage over 50 Chinese sales and marketing staff and I can only say that I am constantly impressed by their abilities, drive, professionalism and innovation. These skills are constantly being further honed by the most competitive market I've ever witnessed.
The point of Dan's post was to look at the difficulty Chinese enterprises are having moving into the US market. I suspect some of these are OEM operations with no local brand or sales and marketing. For them, setting up global operations would be a quantum leap, when they lack those core competencies even in the domestic market. @Twofish's points are valid, each enterprise has to assess whether the risk and investment of building brand and developing distribution is worth it. The are very profitable business models that could just focus on manufacturing and product development.
Joyce Lau - July 27, 2010 9:12 PM
It's not just American companies. Don't forget the Europeans.
Every rich Chinese yearns to have an Louis Vuitton bag, and there is Chanel and Dior in every new major mall.
Yet -- even as a Hong Kong woman who loves fashion -- I have a hard time naming a single Chinese high-end fashion brand or designer. (I'm excluding Hong Kong ones like Shanghai Tang)
I looked online and the main one seems to be Liwai -- only I've never seen their stuff, nor do I remember seeing any of their ads.
In terms of luxury goods, Western companies are fully in command in China. They understand that investing 50% more in quality, branding and customer service can give you a 500% return, as high-end consumers are willing to pay much more for leather that won't break, or having a gracious salesgirl offer to specially order a pair of shoes.
Here, Chinese companies have fallen down on marketing -- and in their own country. They have the technical ability to produce fashion goods, but they don't know how to brand and sell their own.
Some Western luxury companies are trying to "buy back" their Chinese franchises, because they feel that service and quality have slipped too much under local management (e.g. staff with the manners of streetside vendors).
European brands get that people shop at Dior partly for the clothes, but mostly because the experience makes them feel like kings and queens.
Jeffrey S. - July 28, 2010 12:08 AM
You are too optimistic. I've been working with Chinese companies for twenty years and near as I can tell, there has been no chance in their attitudes towards how to do business with the West. If you read this article, you can already see the tension between the Chinese company and its U.S. handlers. If money isn't made fast, the Chinese company is going to bolt, I am certain of that. The race is on.
Twofish - July 28, 2010 11:50 PM
Lau: In terms of luxury goods, Western companies are fully in command in China. They understand that investing 50% more in quality, branding and customer service can give you a 500% return, as high-end consumers are willing to pay much more for leather that won't break, or having a gracious salesgirl offer to specially order a pair of shoes
The trouble is that the luxury goods market is *tiny* and if you aren't already in it, then it doesn't make much sense go there. High end consumers are willing to pay more, but they expect a lot more and pampering them is expensive, and there just aren't many of them. Also good customer service is *hard* and *expensive*.
One mistake that people make is to assume that branding is for rich people and luxury goods. If you are making low quality goods and people are buying, then money is money. Personally I'm not going to pay more for good leather shoes since I'll just buy new ones when my shoes break, and I feel uncomfortable by sales people that are too friendly.
Lau: Here, Chinese companies have fallen down on marketing -- and in their own country. They have the technical ability to produce fashion goods, but they don't know how to brand and sell their own.
Or maybe people are focusing on other markets where there is more money to be made and easier money to be made. It's quite possible that a Chinese company knows how to brand and sell, and decides not to because there is easier money to be made elsewhere.
Lau: Some Western luxury companies are trying to "buy back" their Chinese franchises, because they feel that service and quality have slipped too much under local management (e.g. staff with the manners of streetside vendors).
One problem with selling luxury goods and customer service is that if you want sales staff that don't act like street vendors, you have to pay them more than street vendors. One reason I do like buying things from small stores and street vendors is that often the person selling you the stuff owns the store or vendor, and so you get better service if you show up frequently.
Lau: European brands get that people shop at Dior partly for the clothes, but mostly because the experience makes them feel like kings and queens.
Sure and some people like that. Some people (like me) don't, and my money is as good as their money. So I shop at department stores and not at Dior.
Twofish - July 29, 2010 12:08 AM
Joyce: Chinese companies market themselves well domestically -- but it's usually through a sort of guanxi-relationship with local promoters or press. Anything with state money will probably get a blindly positive "review". Overseas, it doesn't work like that.
Having been in the software business, yes it does in some markets. It's not as explicit as giving money to reporters, but there is a way of creating "buzz" for new products. The Wall Street Journal piece on Zuuma for example is an example of the type of article you want in the press.
Joyce: But someday (soon, I think) China will develop into something more sophisticated than the world's cheap workshop. If it can figure out the "soft" stuff, it will be able to produce top technology, brands and services globally.
Then again maybe not. The problem is that you have mature markets with established competitors. For a Chinese company to compete in the US, it not only has to *match* the companies there, but it has to do better, and as long as the US company doesn't make any serious mistakes, it still will likely lose. It may be just easier for a Chinese company with lots of cash to buy an established brand and then just provide capital.
For technology companies it makes sense to establish a presence in the US because you get know-how, but I'm still wondering what exactly is the business case for a Chinese consumer brand to try to establish a presence in the US. US companies went overseas because they had saturated their domestic markets and needed somewhere else to expand, but with China growing at 10% a year, that's not a factor in Chinese companies.
The three cases I can think of in which a Chinese brand *did* establish itself overseas, it first focused in China, then it went into Middle East/Latin America, and only then did it go into the US and sometimes that was with reluctance.
Chris - July 29, 2010 12:34 AM
@ Jeffrey.
I suspect you have been working with cheap and cheerful OEM producers in Guangdong or Zhejiang. In many senses, you get what you pay for.
We do source lots of printing services from 'cheap and cheerful' print services in Guangdong. Absolutely knock 'em dead prices, great print quality and very good customer service. All this handled by Chines speaking publications staff who can manage our liaison with them. All distributed within China by large local pick and pack logistics companies. A great and very cost effective arrangement for the PRC market and successful business relationships with the same suppliers for 10 years.
When it came to discussing global print production and distribution for our international business, I was adament that we should not take this approach or work with these suppliers. These solutions are great locally, but will not and cannot work for our international markets.
Again, you get what you pay for...
Twofish - July 29, 2010 12:52 AM
One other reason Western luxury brands like China is that you have a lot of noveau riche Chinese that want designer handbags and luxury goods, and the fact that the brands are Western make Chinese think that this is the way things are sold in the West. There is the GM paradox. A lot of brands that are doing wonderful in China just are having a hard time in the US.
One irony is that outside of a few areas (NYC and Southern California), there isn't a big market for luxury goods even among extremely rich people. If you are a dot-com millionaire in Austin, Texas and you started flashing around designer shoes, watches, and handbags, people would think that you are pretentious and arrogant. What you want is to look like a "crunchy granola-type". There is very strong social pressure in the US not to look rich, and not to be proud that you are rich. I've found Greater China to be weird because rich people want to look rich.
The bad economy is not helping. Not only are people unwilling to buy expensive products, but if you have friends that are unemployed, you are not going to show them your expensive Rolex watch, and if you can't show your friends, then what's the point of buying an expensive watch?
Also there are distribution issues and retail issues. Luxury brands in Greater China have more control over distribution and the balance of power between distributors and retailers are very different in China than in the US.
Joyce Lau - July 31, 2010 10:25 AM
Hi Chris -- I wasn't implying that Chinese sales and marketing staff are a big bunch of bumbling idiots. We all know that the domestic market is tough, and that staff have to work hard and well.
My point is that it's tough in a vastly different way than foreign markets are. All these soft skills -- how to work with the media, how to advertise or build a brand -- are different. The original post was about why Chinese companies experience cultural gaps when they try to market themselves overseas . In my opinion, that's why.
Perhaps I should have been clearer. I wasn't speaking about all Chinese business in general. I was adding my two cents about my personal experience: which is in high-end, urban, service-orientated businesses. In this segment, Chinese companies don't quite get "foreign" expectations. (I don't want to say "Western" because I think Hong Kong and Tokyo are good in these fields).