Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

A China That Can Say No.

Posted in Legal News

In going through my hard copy of Asia Legal Business today, I came across an article I wrote a few months back. The article is called “A China That Can Say No,” and though it was written at the very beginning of the Google imbroglio, I think it holds up well. Its thesis is that Google is not terribly central to what most businesses involved in China should be focusing. China is changing separate and apart from Google and though Google may certainly be seen as a sign of that, it is not what happened to Google that should matter to most businesses. It is the change that is going on everywhere else that matters:

The recent Google China brouhaha is both less and more important than depicted by the media. It is less important because when all is said and done, little to nothing will have changed in China as a result of it. Yet it is more important than painted in that when all is said and done, little to nothing will have changed in China.
Let me explain.
The Google China fight is a perfect symbol not so much of where China is heading than as where it sees itself right now. That conflict crystallizes how China now considers itself as being able to thrive without foreign investment. That conflict also highlights how China no longer fears using its own laws to reign in foreign businesses and give competitive succor to its own domestic companies. I do not purport to know why China did what it did with Google nor do I purport to know why Google did what it did with China, but I do know that China has been tightening its legal enforcement against foreign companies, Google included, and I am certain that will only continue.
The direct corollary of China having become less beholden to foreign enterprises is that those enterprises have lost their previously favored status. The best example of this is how foreign enterprises no longer receive special tax benefits not provided to domestic entities. For the last decade, China has had a framework for regulating foreign businesses but has not placed great emphasis on applying it. Now, however, those days of benign neglect are over and the Chinese government is increasingly cracking down on foreign violators of existing regulations, and issuing new guidelines and circulars to enhance what is already on its books.
With China being hailed as the world economy’s savior, its government has concluded it should put more effort into enforcing its laws against foreign businesses. This new world view is already impacting foreign business in China and it will continue. In particular, my law firm has seen the following changes for foreign business in China:
– China’s local governments are more often delaying or denying applications for wholly foreign owned enterprises (WFOEs) and joint ventures. Chinese officials have come right out and said they no longer care whether foreign businesses come to China.
– Registration of technology licenses is more often being prohibited or restricted. The idea seems to be that Chinese businesses should not be required to pay for access to foreign technology.
– Visas for foreign workers are increasingly being delayed, denied or restricted. The view on this is that Chinese workers are available to do any job.
– China is greatly stepping up enforcement of its tax laws against foreign companies.
The Chinese government’s unwillingness to bend in its fight with Google is very public proof of how China’s ascendancy has changed things for foreign businesses in China. For those of us who handle China business law matters, it is a prominent example of the sorts of things we see every day.

What do you think?

  • Cleveland Ressman

    Great post. Let the debate begin!

  • http://nanjingtolondon.wordpress.com/ languageexpert

    Google is trying to make as much noise with their withdrawal from China as possible. If their China business is not worth keeping, at least they want to gain some positive publicity in the West in abandoning it. The Western media are also trying to make as much noise as possible with the issue. But indeed there is little substance of real significance in this matter, because Google does not exclusively own anything that the Chinese badly want.

  • http://www.foreignentrepreneursinchina.com/ Clara Muriel Ruano

    Hi Dan,
    The information is really interesting and I was wondering if you could elaborate on a couple of the topics you mention.
    1) Given that the official line is still that “FDI is very welcome and needed”, and that WFOE seems to be now the favored way of investment… are those applications denied or delayed because they don’t fall into the currently favored industries, is it because due to the crisis they want stronger applicants… there must be something else behind….
    2) And when it comes to foreign technology, one would also expect welcoming arms… it sounds as if they should be happy to upgrade their industry (especially given that if they end up copying it…. IP enforcement is not exactly as strict as it could be). So your views on why is this trend emerging would also be interesting.

  • outcast

    “– Visas for foreign workers are increasingly being delayed, denied or restricted. The view on this is that Chinese workers are available to do any job.”
    I’m sure that Chinese workers are available, but can they do a good job? Based on what I’ve read from engineers at EETimes with regards to electronics and semiconductors, chinese engineers have developed quite a reputation….for being lazy, unproductive, uncreative, unappreciative, and unprofessional. I haven’t had any personal experiences, but given that China as a country uses about 1/3 of all the IC chips in the world (either for its own use or in products for export) and only designs about 1% of all the IC chips in the world despite the existance of hundreds of chinese IC design firms, I think that is a clear indication as to the competance of chinese electronic and computer engineers in general.

  • http://www.ubervu.com/conversations/www.chinalawblog.com/2010/04/a_china_that_can_say_no_why_th.html uberVU – social comments

    Social comments and analytics for this post

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by bestoils: A China That Can Say No. Why That Matters For Your Business.: In going through my hard copy of Asia Legal Busines… http://bit.ly/bZHptA

  • pevonaoki

    Google is trying to make as much noise with their withdrawal from China as possible. If their China business is not worth keeping, at least they want to gain some positive publicity in the West in abandoning it.

  • gregorylent

    i think the feds have google in their pocket
    i think the story has been confusing and mis-reported from day one
    i think the disappearance of the hacking angle of the story is mysterious
    i think google is dumb, on its way to being evil, and china really had nothing to gain by reacting in anyway
    a self-created drama
    totally ignorable

  • stsz

    I don’t think FDI is becoming “unwelcome”. Seems the government just wants to let foreign comparing compete fairly with domestic companies.
    For example, the New enterprise income tax law, which was enacted in 2007 and came to effect on 1/1/2008, now levels both domestic and foreign enterprises’ tax rate to 25%. Previously, most domestic companies are paying 33% tax while foreign companies only pay average around 20%, not including tax breaks, credits, and other incentives they enjoyed.
    Many companies started to realize that going to China is not about saving cost anymore, but about the huge market; Is Not about manufacturing, but about innovation and localization. As Jeffery Immelt called, it is time for “Reverse Innovation”.

  • http://twofish.wordpress.com/ Twofish

    The problem with using Google as an example of China suddenly getting tough on foreign businesses is that it implies that China suddenly put new restrictions on Google, when in fact that censorship that China was imposing on Google have been laws that have always been there, and have always been enforced. Google, for various reasons, decided that it needed to change it’s business strategy, but this wasn’t in response to any change in Chinese behavior. It’s not as if the Chinese government started doing something this year that it wasn’t doing last year.
    One other thing that people miss is that when people mention how the Chinese government is suddenly pulling back the red carpet to foreign investment, increasing tax collection, cracking down on visas, people don’t seem to mention that every other national government is doing the same thing.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com/2010/04/chinas_message_to_foreign_busi.html China Law Blog

    China’s Message To Foreign Business Is Clear. “Whatever.”

    Newsweek recently did a story on China, entitled, “It’s China’s World. We’re Just Living in It. The middle kingdom is rewriting the rules on trade, technology, currency, climate–you name it.” The article is good, but what struck me about it was a kill…