China Law: Go Big Or Go Home. Better Yet, Go Boutique.
Loved an article in this month's Asia Law Business, entitled, "Boutique firms gain market from general practices." The article is written by Rashida Yosufzai and I have multiple reasons for loving it. First, the headline alone is music to my ears as my firm is, as far as I know, the only United States law firm that bills itself as an international law boutique. The article then reaffirms what I thought this recession would do, which is cause companies to move their Asia legal work to boutique law firms to decrease costs and improve services:
Once viewed as the underdogs in the world of the big law firms, specialist and independent firms are benefiting from the post-financial-crisis era of tightened legal budgets. Since the economic downturn, these firms have gained major clients who are moving from bigger firms in the search for lower fees and tailored legal services. "There's been a migration from companies that used to rest their work in larger, more general practices moving to seek the value they can derive from specialised practices," says Farah Namazie, the founder of Singapore-based IP & technology firm Namazie & Co. "Ironically for us, during the economic downturn there has been an increase in work."In Korea, IP boutique Cho & Partners is also reporting increased workloads from its portfolio of MNCs. "When the economy is bad, many large and sophisticated MNCs start re-thinking their choice of firms they use, and whether they really needed to hire the biggest firms to handle their IP matters," says Ik Hyun Seo, a partner at Cho & Partners. "They start pushing firms for fee reductions, and search for other options to get the same level of service, without paying the highest rates in the country."
Competitive legal fees and flexibility are the two main weapons in the specialist firms' arsenal. Even in the US where firms
have been hit hard by the crisis, specialist firms are also benefiting from the legal market 'shifts.' Although Harris & Moure
- a US-based international law practice that focuses on Asia - did feel the economic downturn in 2009, it recorded its
busiest-ever January and February this year. "That's largely due to our getting a number of larger-than-normal clients,
many of whom have told us that they're tired of paying "big firm" prices and like our flat-fee rates," says co-founder Dan
Harris.
Companies are using boutiques not just to save money, but also to get better access to experienced lawyers:
Even without the financial crisis, specialist firms say they are able to gain market share by being flexible and building relationships. That has been the experience of Singapore shipping firm Navin & Co. "Clients tell us fairly often that in specialist boutique law firms like ours they have much easier access to senior partners; the relationship is far more informal and there's greater flexibility in discussing various issues," says managing partner Navinder Singh. "Whereas larger firms they feel are institutionalised and corporatised, and that may distance certain clients."
I couldn't have said it better myself.....
What do you think?

Comments (6)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endBoris Badenuf - March 29, 2010 11:40 PM
Like tell me something we didn't know. Of course, boutique firms are thriving right now in Asia as well as everywhere else. For so many legal matters, they are both cheaper and better and now that this is catching on, the sky is the limit for firms like ours (mine is a boutique real estate firm).
Matthew - March 30, 2010 1:53 AM
Dan,
This is certainly a growing trend. The reality is that in more developed legal jurisdictions mid-tier and boutique firms will generally off more value for money. There is little, if any, difference in quality between lawyers in mid-tiers to those in big-tier firms despite what the latter think.
Asia, and China too, is starting to see the development of the specialist firm (and good quality mid-tiers). To be honest, unless your legal needs are highly sophisticated (big ticket transactions) it makes no real sense to use a big tier.
I also agree with your comments in the article regarding fixed fees. We provide fixed fees where possible and it is genuinely appreciated by our clients.
Chris - March 30, 2010 5:43 AM
Having been gouged rather badly for bread and butter legal advice by the China arm of our global law firm (advice that simply confirmed our Chinese accountancy firms recommendation on HR and service agreements), I agree that boutique law firms with more reasonable rates and a higher level of genuine expertise are a much better option in most circumstances.
Mike McSweeney - March 30, 2010 9:02 PM
Great to hear another boutique's "view" on this economy and its impact on revenue for a small firm. We are a "boutique-global" firm ourselves (management consulting) and we have been experiencing the same over the last 2 years.
ptz - April 3, 2010 8:43 PM
What you say here is so true, but there are those of us who have known it for years and did not need this recession to convince us. I switched to boutique law firms a few years ago after getting a massive bill from a massive law firm on a matter I told them quite clearly was of relatively little importance. I have had enough and that is exactly what is happening elsewhere.
Mary Scott - April 13, 2010 4:40 PM
Dan, the reason firms like yours are thriving is because BigLaw has become so bloated and so expensive that they only make sense for gigantic companies on gigantic matters.