China Joint Ventures. Again.
The Transcript from my AmCham interview on China joint ventures is now online here. We are working on a post on how companies can best protect themselves if they do go forward with a joint venture in China, but in the meantime, this transcript does a nice job (thanks in large measure to Josh Gartner's interviewing skills) of teasing out the state of the joint venture in China today.
http://www.chinalawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/3316
» China Joint Ventures Again. This Time We Blame The Victims. China Law Blog
By Steve Dickinson Dan did a recent interview on joint ventures in China with Amcham and a couple of follow up posts, entitled, "Love The One You're With. When China Joint Ventures Make Sense," and "The China Joint Venture. It's BACK!!!" We are writing... []


Comments
If someone gets into a JV with a Chinese company/person and is not getting their agreed upon share of revenues, how realistic is it to have a successful lawsuit and get full monetary recovery, if it goes that far?
Posted by: Greg | October 29, 2009 12:33 PM
Joint ventures in or with China seem like such risky propositions. There are just too many cultural and legal gaps between us.
Posted by: Joe | October 29, 2009 11:48 PM
The statistics provided by the Ministry of Commerce of China shows that from Jan to Sept of 2009 the amount of newly established equity joint ventures declines 15.09% compared with that of 2008, well the amount of WFOEs declines 22.64%. In addition to the economic reason and legal restrictions, I think there are some other reasons, especially when the business is an emerging one in China and is profitable.
Regarding the protection for the foreign party, if we notice the fact that most disputes arise in those joint ventures where neither party can control, we can easily understand why control is the key point. But how to control is a complicated issue because Chinese law makes it not so easy for either party to completely control the joint venture. But for the foreign investors I think what they concern most is whether they can make profits and how to make profits. So it's better that the protection is designed case by case based on what advantages the foreign investors have. Of course, there are some common protection choices.
Posted by: Wallice | October 30, 2009 8:43 PM
@ Wallice,
Thanks for the viewpoint. The ones I am looking at would not involve control, I realize that is a huge sticking point, I am just interested in getting my agreed percentage (and the book keeping being honest, so I that I am getting the the correct amount).
Posted by: Greg | November 1, 2009 3:16 PM