China's Labor Law. The Bark Is The Bite.

Got a call last week from the HR officer of a US company. She was looking for my firm to assist her on a labor law issue. The US company's China WFOE had laid off a female employee who had come back saying she was entitled to ten months pregnancy pay. The employee gave three legitimate sounding reasons for this entitlement.

I learned that this employee's yearly salary was about $3600 and that the WFOE was in Shenzhen. I also learned that this employee did not have a written contract and that the WFOE did not have an employee manual. I told the HR officer that for us to research whether this ex-employee was entitled to what she is seeking, we would need to research the laws of China, of Guangdong province and of Shenzhen. I then told her that the cost of our doing that would be so close to what the employee was seeking and that I was very dubious that our research would reveal any cost savings (particularly because this employee had no written contract and this WFOE had no employee manual) that it would almost certainly not make sense for us to take on the matter.

But I also told her that if the WFOE chose to pay this ex-employee her ten months salary that it needed to have her sign an appropriate release, in Chinese, making it so that she would not be able to sue the company and win, even after receiving payment. I told her that from what we have been hearing, foreign companies lose pretty much every time in these sorts of employee disputes and they usually lose a lot more than just the one case. I told her that what happens is that the company loses the one case, all the other employees hear about it and then they sue as well. I stressed again the need to contain the problems stemming from this one employee right away by means of a well-crafted written agreement in Chinese.

She is to get back to me this week, after she talks with the company owners.

Comments (5)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Winston - June 28, 2009 9:40 PM

Well...sounds like that firm is potentially in big troubles. No contract is subject to double pay as penalty. That women is definately entitled to compensation for the period of her preganancy up to 1 year after she gives birth. And it's definitely illegal to dismiss a woman who's pregnant or in the nursing period. I'd suggest you work out a deal with her and have her agree and sign on the settlement, before she wakes up and files a lawsuit.

Hang - June 28, 2009 11:39 PM

It seems many HR managers are not competent for the job they are doing. The labor law is not so complicated and is still quite comprehensible to an educated person. Some research will help solve most cases.

Glen - June 29, 2009 10:38 AM

I'm still amazed that large companies (or any company for that matter) operating in China still aren't following the rules. If they aren't dotting their "i"s and crossing their "t"s with their own employee contracts, I'm willing to bet they aren't up to speed on other regulations like environmental law. Chinese courts and legal aid foundations(as I'm sure we're all aware) are making significant headway in educating the public about environmental and other litigation. Simply put: it's just getting easier for the average person to sue.

Mr. Harris, your firm will be getting a lot of calls in the next few years. 鹬蚌相争,渔翁得利

D - July 13, 2009 10:00 PM

Something we've just learned...

Our city has apparently agreed at the intermediate court level that the Labour Contract Law overrides the previous one child policy which stated that the employee must be married and having their first child to be 'protected'.

We're certainly not in the same situation as the case you mention - we are a WFOE with employment contracts, a handbook and a pretty good reputation.

We did, however, terminate an unmarried employee with no knowledge that she was pregnant at the time and are apparently going to lose the case because, we've been told, that as long as a terminated employee can prove that they conceived while they were still an employee then they are protected and should be re-employed or compensated for the entire duration of pregnancy and nursing.

MesterMister - April 14, 2011 5:01 AM

Interested to hear what the outcome of this was.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is