China, Somali Piracy, And Minding The Gap.

I am a big fan of Thomas Barnett who is, perhaps, most famous for dividing countries between core and gap, as explained here by Wikipedia:

Barnett has termed the globalized countries the "Functioning Core," or simply "the Core." The other countries are part of the "Non-Integrating Gap," or simply "the Gap." The Gap has been shrinking as globalization has expanded. Since most terrorists seem to come from the Gap, he believes that the American military should focus on building partnerships with "seam states," countries bordering the Gap, to stabilize those regions. Stable states would bring more investment and more connectedness with the outside world, therefore progressively shrinking the Gap. The end result of all of this, if it proves to be successful, would be nothing less than the end of interstate warfare on the planet, and probably a significant reduction in intrastate warfare and other problems like terrorism.

I was reminded of these distinctions when I read this post on China Bystander, entitled, "China Considering Sending Warships To Fight Somali Pirates." Many years ago (while under a mosquito net in Papua New Guinea, but I digress), I read Bernard Lewis's book on Islam, entitled, "What Went Wrong," and he too seemed to divide the world between those countries that have embraced modernity and those countries (almost exclusively Islamic) that have explicitly rejected it. I divide the world between those countries that are already integrated into the worldwide economy or moving towards such integration and those countries (Iran, Zimbabwe, North Korea, quickly come to mind) that seem too distracted by internal and/or external repression even to try moving forward economically or to engage or work with the rest of the world.

Yes, China's talking of sending troops to Somalia is out of self interest, but it does show engagement and it does place China squarely within the core.

UPDATE: Barnett says the same thing, a day later, here.

Comments (2)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Inst - December 18, 2008 4:29 AM

Isn't this just a rehash of the Marxist World Systems Theory?

Greg - December 18, 2008 9:52 AM

China would have to be very careful in this situation, as it is used to being able to use heavy handed tactics to deal with civil unrest and crime in China and brush off complaints.

It has significant political and economic interests in Africa and it could be very negative to sink a real fishing trawler as the Indian navy recently did, thinking it was a mothership.

And the pirates literally have nothing to lose by continuing to plunder booty (couldn't resist using that one!). Some die and some go to jail, but along the Somali coast more youngsters are being taught high seas capture techniques by warlords. No jobs, bad fishing (in part due to the waste from that ship traffic) and every pic I've seen of Somalia does not suggest great agriculture.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is