Girls Just Want To Be Born. What Korea Could Teach China About Sex.
Excellent piece at the consistently excellent blog, How the World Works, entitled, "Girls Just Want to Be Born." The piece is on how South Korea has become "the first Asian country to reverse the discouraging trend of 'rising sex ratios at birth' -- by which is meant families taking advantage of new sex-selection technologies (or good old-fashioned female infanticide) to favor boys rather than girls." The post posits that what is happening regarding sex selection (or lack thereof) in Korea may offer "promise for other Asian countries, especially India and China, where 'son preference' is also rampant and social demographics have become highly skewed."
The post attributes the change in Korea mostly to "the process of development" having "spread . . . new social norms that have chipped steadily away at the old [sexist] regime.
Et tu China?
http://www.chinalawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/2215
Girls Just Want To Be Born. What Korea Could Teach China About Sex.:
» "Confucian" Societies can Change The Useless Tree
Here's a follow-up to Tuesday's post on Confucianism without Women, a story in Salon.com (hat tip China Law Blog) about a World Bank report that shows a change in social norms in South Korea away from male birth preferences (the []


Comments
The bulk of China may be many years behind South Korea, but urbanites show a fairly strong bias for daughters. Girls tend to be better behaved as children, have more opportunities to advance even if they don't do well on the all-important national exams and are a better bet as parental caregivers. Families with daughters also don't bear the onerous wedding costs.
Even outside of major metropolitan areas, girls have more job opportunities, are more likely marry up and advance socially. Their parents also don't have to worry about finding a daughter-in-law from a badly skewed marriage pool.
The dynamic for India is totally different. Indian daughters are much more costly to their parents and there's less social mobility for the girls.
Posted by: astrid | October 26, 2007 7:17 AM
True, in India, you have to pay someone to take your daughter (big liability). In China, the one child policy is the first problem, with religious, ethnic and economic incentives being the final problems.
Posted by: nanheyangrouchuan | October 26, 2007 8:12 AM
Wow... that's an interesting result. In the past when I had discussed the existence of glass ceilings/double standards/what have you in China with some of my students, often times they would say at least women in China are better off than in Korea or Japan. But it appears times are a-changin'.
Posted by: Rene | October 26, 2007 1:47 PM
NH: If my daughter had ideas like yours, I'd probably also have to pay someone to take her.
Posted by: Law Office of Todd L. Platek | October 26, 2007 6:35 PM
Q: Mr. Platek, what, specifically, do you find wrong with Lamb Kebab? I have a similar distaste for his ideas, but I can't seem to finger how his ideas are inconsistent, wrong, or morally dubious.
Posted by: Inst | October 27, 2007 7:20 AM
support for the Beijing olympics is morally dubious:
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1357069DKZqmaty
Posted by: nanheyangrouchuan | October 28, 2007 11:26 AM
I don't think it's fair to compare the metropolitan Korea with mostly rural China in general. There are vast regional difference in China and there are areas in China with more advance view on girls then the others. One of the best quote on gender equality in Shanghai is from an interview in That's Shanghai with a 24 years old Shanghainess girl: "I think gender is more equal in my generation. Unlike my mom, I sometime help my boyfriend with the dishes."
Posted by: David Li | October 28, 2007 2:23 PM
Inst: A consistently negative take on every matter possible under discussion is my specific objection. His moniker "bad bad China" is specifically unjustified.
Posted by: Law Office of Todd L. Platek | October 28, 2007 7:02 PM
Todd:
Are going to engage in petty insult tossing? I thought you were Mr. Moral Highground. Of course, doing business with a totalitarian, mass murdering regime and traitorous corporations kinda erodes your stance.
Posted by: nanheyangrouchuan | October 28, 2007 8:21 PM
Rene,
The gender situation in urban China is very different from rural China, and there's strong regional cultural differences as well. In southern cities, daughters are quite desireable. In the countryside, there's a still a very very strong culturally and possibly economically motivated biases for boy children, though the economic equation there is also moving in favor of girls.
Posted by: astrid | October 29, 2007 7:03 AM
Astrid,
What is the basis of your opinion? It doesn't seem to match the facts (e.g. the M:F ratio is pretty skewed in areas like Guangzhou, which aren't exactly countryside).
Posted by: Tony | October 29, 2007 8:01 AM
NH: I am Mr. Let's Keep An Open Mind, and,yes, am liable (not guilty) to represent all sorts of clients. The companies from US and elsewhere doing business in China are doing many positive things for China and Chinese people in terms of improving life. If you can identify gas chambers being built and/or operated there, with or without foreign assistance, kindly so report so that we may all become enlightened. I only ask you to perform fair and balanced investigation and reporting, from time to time. Is it that you only see the negative wherever you look, or that it is the negative on which you prefer to expound?
Posted by: Law Office of Todd L. Platek | October 29, 2007 10:13 AM