Header graphic for print
China Law Blog China Law for Business

China Air Safety: Damn Good

Posted in China Travel

Excellent article in the Wall Street Journal on a topic near and dear to my heart: air safety. The article is entitled “How China Turned Around A Dismal Air-Safety Record Foreign Help Combined With Willful Regulator” and it discusses how China’s air safety (which I knew to be good) has risen to the level of great. Interestingly, the article also talks about how China’s action on air safety might be applied similarly to the product safety.
For much of the 1990s, Chinese air safety was “arguably the world’s most dangerous, beset by persistent pilot errors, unreliable maintenance and erratic government oversight.” Today, however, China is “an acclaimed global leader in air safety” with fatal-accident rates lower than America’s and Europe’s. China achieved this turnaround under Yang Yuanyuan (a/k/a Triple Y), “a hard-charging aviation official” who made it a point to “adopt a more open attitude” and to learn from foreign accidents and incidents.
China took the following steps to reduce crashes:

• Established programs for Chinese regulators and airline officials to learn from their U.S. counterparts
• Enlisted help from governments and manufacturers to draft new safety regulations and procedures
• Relied on international aviation safety organizations to conduct audits, recommend improvements
• Increased training for mechanics, pilots, government inspectors, airline officials
• Pledged close cooperation with foreign crash investigators

Chet Ekstrand, a senior Boeing safety expert who worked with China on improving its airplane safety, marveled “at how the Chinese ‘could be so candid in revealing shortcomings’ to outsiders.” China’s aviation authority took its task very seriously:

At crucial junctures, officials at the Chinese aviation authority did something akin to heresy for a burgeoning economic superpower: They threatened to halt deliveries of new aircraft to China’s airlines until a comprehensive, multiyear safety roadmap was in place and they were confident that airline officials were taking it seriously.

China also did not hesitate to secure assistance from outside China:

More than two dozen U.S. companies, from engine makers to cockpit-instrument suppliers, banded together to provide technical help. FAA officials helped the Chinese beef up air-traffic control designs and inspection procedures.
Chinese airline officials, regulators and air-traffic-control managers were targeted for an exchange program focused on skills such as strategic planning and project oversight. In the continuing program, candidates spend three months in the U.S. including stints with major airlines and aircraft manufacturers. Airbus and French aviation colleges have separate agreements to train Chinese safety managers.

China’s commercial aviation sector is also surprisingly transparent:

When Chinese carriers began flying a new generation of smaller regional jets, they faced a fresh set of safety issues. In November 2004, a Bombardier CRJ-200 plunged into an ice-covered Mongolian lake seconds after taking off in good weather, killing 54. Mr. Yang let U.S. and other foreign investigators visit the site within hours. Investigators later pegged the likely cause as wing ice stemming from failure by the crew to take necessary precautions.
Prompted partly by that crash, China and the International Air Transport Association, which represents the interests of airlines, worked out a separate cooperation pact. China became a pioneer in allowing IATA specialists to audit all airlines and in due course release their findings.

All this has led the accident rate for Chinese carriers to improve “roughly tenfold since the mid-1990s” during which time fatality rates moved in the opposite direction in Africa and parts of the former Soviet Union. No Chinese jetliner has crashed since 2004 giving China the “best safety performance in the world in the past three years.”
The article sees China product safety as a similar challenge as it too will require China “balance safety and growth.” Both also require a “very strong, central agency to establish rules” plus “well-trained people able to adapt and impose them in the Chinese environment.”

  • http://badbadchina.blogspot.com nanheyangrouchuan

    Yet from the summer or spring this year there is a famous picture of a China Eastern plane that landed in Germany and was prevented from leaving because there were cargo straps holding the intake turbine fans together, not to mention other gross safety violations.

  • http://www.translatechina.com Glen Wilkins

    Along with safety, service is great too. In 2005, my flight from Kunming to Haikou was delayed and the airline provided a bus and put us up in a 4 star hotel for 10 hours until weather passed. In the US we would have had to fend for ourselves on over-priced airport food and try to curl up in those minuscule gate chairs. For shame US airlines.

  • jms

    I have seen the pictures with the engine turbines held together by cargo straps. However, there is no evidence based on the pictures that the engine was installed on a China Eastern aircraft. I did not see China Eastern logo anywhere on the engine. It may very well have been one of those urban legends.
    Besides, even if the picture is true and China Eastern committed gross safety violations, it should not tarnish the achievements of the entire Chinese aviation industry. Air Madrid was forced to close because it was not even following basic maintenance produres; but would it make any sense to characterize the entire European aviation industry as unsafe simply because of one black sheep?
    The simple fact is that there has not been any crash involving Chinese carriers for the past three years and that speaks louder than anything.

  • Ben

    Great service??? Have you eaten the food Chinese airlines provide? Ai ya!

  • Duncan

    Hmmm, early signs of the WSJ becoming fawning under Murdoch? Too good a chance not to post this one again…
    http://www.aiaa.org/aerospace/images/articleimages/pdf/AA_Sept05_AU.pdf
    Though I’d love to believe that my dulcet tones on the tape of conversations used to help pilots practise “cockpit disaster English” (recorded during an enlightening year teaching English in the CAAC flight school) had something to do with an improvement in safety standards…

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com China Law Blog

    nh –
    Good one. There have been no crashes for three years and you counter that with a picture that may or may not be authentic?

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com China Law Blog

    Glen Wilkins,
    Thanks for stopping by. It would appear you believe you are at the Singapore Law Blog. We are the China Law Blog.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com China Law Blog

    jms,
    I concur.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com China Law Blog

    Ben,
    I postulated that Mr. Wilkens has mistaken us for the Singapore Law Blog as the service he describes cannot be found in China. As for the food on China flights, I have never eaten anything beyond a cookie.

  • http://www.chinalawblog.com China Law Blog

    Duncan,
    The article did probably fawn a bit too much, but what if it’s all true? The article to which you refer is from 2005, which is China’s equivalent of last century and long before your teachings had sunk in.

  • http://badbadchina.blogspot.com nanheyangrouchuan

    And the “fake” photos of the Shanghai Air or China Eastern plane whose tail section broke off?
    I’m not saying that China Inc’s air traffic is riddled with accidents, but I do know first hand of China’s troubles maintaining its locomotives and train traffic management.

  • jms

    I think Mr. Wilkins is correct. To the best of my knowledge, if a flight is cancelled in China due to inclement weather, the carrier is obligated to provide lodging for stranded passengers.
    nh – This blog entry is about Chinese aviation, not about Chinese transportation in general. I would not dispute that China’s ground transportation system has serious problems. But in terms of air transportation management, they have improved tremendously in the past decade. Please give them some credit.

  • JL

    Chinalawblog:
    I find your dismissal of Glen’s comments rather odd and uncharacteristic. That service does exist in China, it’s happened to me twice. In fact generally speaking I would say that the service in Chinese airports is of a higher standard than in Britain’s. Lines at check-in, immigration and customs are typically much shorter, and in my experience at least, the staff tend to be friendlier. As for the food… well, I agree, but remember they’re never going to design their menus to suit the two Americans on a flight.
    I know what you’re thinking, and, no,I’m not Charles Liu writing under a new pseudonym.

  • http://wangbo.blogtown.co.nz chriswaugh_bj

    nh: The last time- no, the only time- I saw a picture of an airplane with its tail broken off it was an Indonesian, and certainly not a Chinese, airline at fault. Evidence please.
    As for locomotives and train traffic, after damn near (as in a few days short of-) eight years in China and a fair amount of travel, I have to say I’ve experienced more delays on flights than on trains, and no more trouble on trains than one delay- due to track maintenance- and overcrowding- hard seat tickets during a Golden Week. Really, try to come up with some evidence for your claims, nh.

  • http://www.translatechina.com Glen Wilkins

    True, true, the food could use improvement. I have a vague memory of dry white rice and mysterious green mush (spinach? 油菜?algae?). The best meals I have had so far have been on Asiana as I have not yet had the pleasure of flying Singapore Airlines.
    I think the improvement of the Chinese aviation industry is attributable to both the conscientiousness of the government and also the recent flush of cash has allowed the PRC to leapfrog and purchase new aircraft, avionics and infrastructure. We can assume that if the Chinese economy keeps churning away as it is that eventually we will get a decent snack on the red eye from Harbin to Fuzhou. We can only hope.

  • Ben

    JL,
    Perhaps the service you speak of does exist, but my point and what I believe to be CLB’s point is that Glen draws way too broad a conclusion about service in the Chinese ariline industry from a single flight in 2005. Perhaps he was lucky enough to fly on Hainan Airlines, which is one of China’s more comfortable carriers.
    When you talk about shorter lines, is that because of a commitment to service in the airline industry or because Chinese airports are state-run and thus tend to have both over-employment and much more capacity for passengers than they need? I think CLB and I were talking about the airlines themselves and not the airports.

  • Law Office of Todd L. Platek

    In any event, vastly better year after year. In 1996 I took an Air China flight from NY on a dilapidated 747, and it was 10 hours at JFK before we even took off. Seat trays were taped around seats to keep them from falling down, and numerous seats could not even maintain an upright position. The seating area constituted the first 2/3 of the plane, and the rear 1/3 was surreal cargo storage, in which we were allowed to walk to put our excess baggage. A short stopover in Anchorage turned into a 24-hour disaster because the plane had allegedly lost radar, the nose cone was popped open, and parts had to be flown in from China. Air China was extremely generous about food, drink and overnight lodgings. The continuation of the flight to BJ was smooth physically, although prayers were being uttered throughout. So, now in 2007, you say “damn good?” You better believe it.

  • JL

    Ben -I’m not really sure what you’re point is.
    My point is that, in flight meals aside, there isn’t a measurable difference between China and Britain, in the service either at the airports or on the planes. (Maybe it’s different for business class travellers). The length of the check-in line does depend partly on the airline as the staff at the check-in desk are employed by the airline not the airport. But in any case whether the service is a result of the state of or the specific companies is rather irrelevant.

  • Therese

    CWB:
    I disagree. In May 2006, a friend was to fly from Shanghai (PVG) to Tokyo. Her flight was delayed “for some time”, and when the attendants finally decided to let the passengers know how long that would be (“a few more hours”) some three hours after the flight was to leave, they placed them in a four star hotel in a somewhat inconvenient part of Shanghai (though thankfully near the Longcao Road Line 3 Metro stop). After giving other passengers her mobile number, she managed to make it to supper (by the lovely Surinam restaurant on N Shaanxi Rd, which I absolutely recommend) with us. I believe that they left around 11AM the next day, all of which was, of course, unannounced.
    But you see, they do provide hotels in the event of a delay! : )

  • Pingback: China local brands brace for onslaught from abroad - Page 5