China's Legal Revolution, July 3 On PBS
On July 3rd, 9:00 pm Eastern Time, PBS will be running a documentary on the Chinese legal system, entitled, "The People's Court: China's Legal Revolution." And is it just me, or is the guy on the far right of the site a near dead ringer for Lloyd, from the HBO series, Entourage?
PBS e-mailed me regarding the show, describing it as follows:
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD DISPUTES TO LIFE-AND-DEATH CASES, WIDE ANGLE FOLLOWS JUDGES, LAWYERS AND ordinary citizens SEEKING JUSTICE AS CHINA BUILDS A LEGAL FRAMEWORK FROM SCRATCH FOR ITS NEW MARKET ECONOMY, IN THE PEOPLE'S COURT
WIDE ANGLE Launches Its Sixth Season Tuesday, July 3 at 9 p.m. On PBS.
When a state judge brings her mobile court to a hillside village to resolve its first lawsuit, the entire community shows up for the public spectacle. When a crusading lawyer risks government retribution to defend farmers rioting against a massive dam project, a teenager is tried and executed in secret.
It may be the court of "the people," but it's a long, long way from Judge Wapner's California courtroom.
As WIDE ANGLE returns for its sixth season of in-depth documentaries about issues that are shaping the world today, The People's Court takes viewers inside the courtrooms and law schools of China to provide an unprecedented and unexpected portrait of its rapidly
growing legal system. The People's Court premieres Tuesday, July 3 at 9 p.m. (ET) on PBS (check local listings).Poised to surpass the United States as the largest economy in the world, yet facing mounting domestic and international pressure for fair and transparent framework of laws, China is racing to reshape the rules of society. With Chinese from all walks of life taking to the streets in record numbers (official figures count an average of 200 incidents of unrest a day) to protest land seizures, corruption, pollution, or unpaid wages, China is under duress to provide a release valve for mounting social discontents. "Rule of law," originally a Western concept, was recently adopted in China's Constitution for the
first time ever, and legal reform is high on the state agenda, despite the Communist Party's continuing monopoly on power. Above all, a market economy requires a reliable framework of property rights, without which international investors cannot do business with China.In the past quarter century, the country has opened nearly 400 law schools, trained hundreds of thousands of judges and lawyers, and launched education campaigns to encourage people to bring their grievances to court rather than taking to the streets. Few nations have ever attempted to create a new legal system so quickly. Yet the transformation is incomplete and the judiciary far from independent. Senior judges are appointed by, take orders from, and receive their paychecks from the Communist Party. Hundreds of Chinese lawyers have been jailed in recent years for challenging state
leadership or taking on overly sensitive cases. More than 99 percent of criminal cases end in convictions. And China executes more prisoners every year than the rest of the world combined. The People's Court reports the shocking story of the recent secret trial and execution of one of the 100,000 peasants who protested the loss of their land to a
huge hydroelectric dam project on the Dadu River.WIDE ANGLE was given exclusive access to film in Chinese courts -- a first for a Western documentary. Profiling itinerant judges, law students, a human rights lawyer, and ordinary citizens, The People's Court examines China in flux, revealing the lengths to which Chinese people must go to obtain justice and raising crucial questions about
their present system of law: Is it possible to get a fair trial in China today? Will the "rule of law" transform Chinese society into one that protects the legal rights of all citizens?After the film, WIDE ANGLE anchor Daljit Dhaliwal will conduct an interview with a foreign policy expert to examine the global implications of China's legal reforms and connect the dots for American viewers.
Though it certainly sounds interesting and I most certainly will be watching it, I am a bit skeptical it will be able to tell us much in its one or two hour slot. I will report back.

Comments (7)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endAnthony W - June 24, 2007 4:49 AM
I admit that I am anxious to view this upcoming program.
As a budding international law student, the fact that it will show footage inside the Chinese courts will be an excellent educational experience by comparing it with Australia's own.
Thanks for the post!
Law Office of Todd L. Platek - June 24, 2007 9:43 AM
We all hold strong hope for the Chinese judicial system. Why, last year in a court there, a judge told local counsel and me that if the foreign party felt the case was so important that its American lawyer should also be present at the proceedings, then the judge would be very careful to do a thorough job. Very reassuring, no?
instructor - June 24, 2007 11:03 AM
Rex Lee's face looks to me a bit thinner than the guy in the group picture.
Thanks for the heads-up on this show. I don't generally spend much time viewing the electronic wasteland these days, so I occasionally miss the rare show worth watching. I will be setting my TIVO to get this one.
China Law Blog - June 24, 2007 2:24 PM
Todd Platek --
Yes and no, but further proof as to why we tell our clients it is critical Steve (co-blogger based in China) attend their hearings along with Chinese counsel. I can remember being so well treated by the Chinese judges before whom we had cases in the pre-WTO days that I would joke they actually thought I had influence on the vote for China's acceptance.
I have no doubt that Chinese judges are extra careful on big cases and on cases involving a foreign company and then even more so if the foreign lawyer shows up. But I have always thought this was true in every country, including the US, where, as we all know, it is a good idea to bring in your client (to humanize the case) when a tough decision has to be made by the court. Judges everywhere are human beings, not automatons.
China Law Blog - June 24, 2007 2:25 PM
instructor (HH) --
Glad to be of service and glad you at least see the resemblance. It was my first thought when I saw the picture and I just could not resist.
Law Office of Todd L. Platek - June 24, 2007 3:08 PM
Hard to generalize. I never like to bring a client to a court hearing unless commanded by the court to do so. First, NY judges usually don't want parties present at hearings except settlement conferences, and even then, just the recalcitrant parties; "attorneys only" is generally the courts' clarion call. Second, I don't want to expose a client to potential abuse by an opponent or sua sponte questioning by an over-enthusiastic judge, and likewise don't appreciate an overly zealous client reminding us "Tell the judge that...." especially if it's something the client never told us before. Thorough preparation generally anticipates the unexpected. If really surprised by something out of the blue, a continuation can cure it.
nanheyangrouchuan - June 25, 2007 6:12 PM
For us western viewers, this trial will be the most perfectly orchestrated trial in the history of Chinese courts.