China Procurement Centers Going WOFE Because It Makes Sense

Because Chinese goods are so cheap, a huge number of foreign businesses have set up procurement centers in China to oversee their China purchasing.  For many years, these China procurement centers were formed as Representative Offices because Chinese law did not allow such businesses to be Wholly Foreign Owned Entities (WFOE). 

That law recently changed and my firm has been inundated with converting these representative offices into WFOEs.  These procurement centers are taking advantage of Chinese law now allowing trading companies to form as WFOEs.  The typical procedure is to form a new China WFOE trading company and then "sell" the assets of the representative office to the new WFOE. The new WFOE is a Chinese entity and is subject to taxation in the same manner as are all foreign owned companies (WFOEs) in China.

Since Representative Offices in China are not permitted to conduct business in China, they are not subject to China's business income tax.  They are, however, subject to a 10% tax on their gross expenses.  This tax is not considered to be an income tax because under Chinese law, Representative Offices cannot earn income.  Procurement Center Representative Offices in China are converting to WFOE trading companies to take advantage of the following: 

  1. Employment in China:  A Representative Office is not permitted to hire Chinese employees directly.  A WFOE can hire Chinese employees directly. 
  2. Location of Operations in China:  A Representative Office is permitted to operate only in the city in which it is formed.  Any office in a different city requires forming a completely separate representative office.  Now that procurement centers are permitted to form as WFOEs, the Chinese authorities are beginning to crack down on those companies operating unregistered satellite offices. One government official told us "they" were no longer willing to look the other way on these violations.  The typical penalty so far has been to close down the offending office or offices and impose any previously unpaid taxes.  We are not aware of other civil or criminal penalties being imposed (even though available), but we expect to see those imposed on those companies that lag behind in getting legal.  Things are much more flexible for a WFOE.  The WFOE is formed in one city, but then, by using a simple notice procedure, can open up branch offices in other cities throughout China.
  3. Taxation:  A WFOE trading company operating as a procurement center normally pays less in taxes than the equivalent Representative Office. This is because a Representative Office pays taxes on its gross expenses, not on its income.  If properly structured, a WFOE procurement center will earn little to no income in China because its revenues will be balanced out by its expenses. Since there is little to no income, there is little to no tax.  Because these WFOE procurement centers will normally pay little to no taxes on income, they typically need not worry about locating in a tax free zone and can focus on operational reasons in determining their China location.  This lack of income also means that even if China raises its tax rate on foreign companies to bring it into line with its tax rate on domestic companies, procurement center WFOEs will feel little to no impact.

Though converting from a Representative Office to a WFOE is initially fairly complicated, its long run costs savings makes it worth it for most foreign procurement centers in China currently operating as a Representative Office. 

Comments (10)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Jeff - January 25, 2007 4:30 PM

Informative. Enjoyed your blogging. Also, a book I am reading is very interesting: China and the new world order, by the provocative Chinese journalist George Zhibin Gu, which is huge on China and global affairs.

China Law Blog - January 26, 2007 6:29 AM

Jeff --

Thanks for checking in and thanks for the compliments. I will have to check out that book, but I am already two behind. I am working on The China Ready Company right now and then will be moving on to a book where 20 CEOS discuss China. I still need to do my review of China Shakes the World, which I finished months ago.

Chris Carr - January 26, 2007 8:02 PM

Hi Dan.

I will be interested to hear what you think about 20 CEOs Discuss China.

Parts of it I thought were insightful. Most of it I would give a modest B. I thought that many of their points were either common sense, or, pointed out in blog land on a regular basis. Having said that, am still glad I read it and learned some things.

I don't know what it is .... anymore when I read, and I read a lot, I usually find only a chapter or two of a book that really engages me and the rest of the book is kind of blah. It's not that I know more, because I don't.

I guess my 2 year old and I have something in common with having a hard time paying attention when one should.

PiPi - January 26, 2007 9:03 PM

Great post. I think there is also some benefits to trading/procurement companies to opening up in zones like the Waigaoqiao free trade zone in Shanghai.

China Law Blog - January 26, 2007 9:48 PM

Chris --

Funny you should say that because just tonight at a dinner I was discussing the book, Fast Food Nation and how dissappointed I was by it. I had read the really long article (was it in New Yorker or Vanity Fair, or somewhere else?) that led to the book and really thought highly of the article. But the book was essentially an article stretched into a book and by the end I was so sick of ALL the world's ills being blamed on McDonalds I could have screamed. So what I was saying at dinner tonight is that too many books these days start out as great 50 page articles and then to make more money they become 250 page books when there is really only 75 pages of good material.

Don't know if this is true of 20 CEOs because I'm not even on page 50, so you tell me.

But here's a book I'm always pitching that is good from beginning to end: World on Fire. One of the few books that caused me to shift my view on something really major. It caused me to believe democracy should not be rushed. It did not shake my belief in democracy one bit, but it did make me realize the difficulties of just imposing it. It was written before the Iraq war so it has nothng to do wtih that, which is probably fortunate.

China Law Blog - January 26, 2007 9:49 PM

PiPi --

That's the thing though, if you structure it properly, you can set it up so that it makes no income and you pay no taxes, tax free zone or not.

PiPi - January 27, 2007 12:41 AM

Dan - good point. Ignore my previous comment, I was having a hungover blonde moment.

Chris Carr - January 27, 2007 7:21 AM

Hi Dan.

Good point. Friedman's World is Flat is another example. I enjoyed the book, but he could have done it in half the paper.

Re the CEO book, I think it's worth finishing. The nuggets I found were worth waiting for. Also, as sick as this sounds, I often finish books just to see and learn more about the architecture of a book and how the author thinks. This in turn gives me ideas for what to do/not do in some of my own writing. And back to the CEO book, heck, I am not arrogant enough to think I can't learn a few things from what these CEOs have to say. They are accomplished people and I don't think most any of the Monday morning quarterbacks out there appreciate how damn hard it is to become a CEO and be a good one.

China Law Blog - January 28, 2007 6:35 PM

PiPi --

How come I never get those? Don't anyone answer that.

China Law Blog - January 28, 2007 6:37 PM

Chris Carr --

I was about to agree with you regarding The World is Flat, then I thought a bit harder and remembered I have actually never read the book. But, I have read so much about it and so much Friedman, I feel I have read it and if you are saying it should be only half as long, I guess I should only feel like I've read half of it.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is