China's New Bankruptcy Laws: Good For Business

Today's Wall Street Journal has the best article on China's just enacted new bankruptcy laws.  Entitled, "China Puts Creditors First With New Bankruptcy Law," [subscription may be required], the article assesses the new laws, set to take effect on June 1, 2007, as "enhancing the market-oriented rules governing the world's fourth-largest economy." China's old bankruptcy laws technically applied only to state-owned enterprises (SOEs). 

Under China's current bankruptcy rules, insolvent companies are required to pay their employees before they pay their creditors.  The new law requires companies "that go bankrupt to pay guarantees to creditors first, with employee salaries and other obligations paid out of what remains." This is obviously more creditor friendly and "backers of the measure described it as a milestone for Chinese economic overhauls that will strengthen the rights of creditors and bring China closer to international legal standards:" 

"This is the most important law for the market economy," said Li Shuguang, director of the Bankruptcy Law and Restructuring Research Center at the China University of Political Science and Law in Beijing. Mr. Li, who has helped draft the legislation, said "it's a very important step for further market economic reforms" and one that will "give foreign investors a more stable legal environment."

The "creditors-first requirement applies only to bankruptcies that are initiated after the new law takes effect."  The new laws had been slowed down, in part, out of a fear that it would lead to a rash of state sector bankruptcies:

Efforts to draft a new bankruptcy law began in 1994, but opponents had blocked it for years, in part because they worried it would lead to a rash of new bankruptcies at troubled state-sector companies. But government-administered bankruptcies of such firms have taken place even without the law -- 3,658 of them between 1994 and 2005, according to the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission.

Xinhua said an additional 2,000-odd government companies are planning bankruptcy. It said the central government this year has set aside 33.8 billion yuan ($4.2 billion) to help those companies settle with their laid-off workers.

The China Economic Review mentions that the new law "makes an exception for around 2,000 ailing state-owned enterprises which can be closed down with the aid of government bailouts and can pay laid-off workers first if they announce bankruptcy before June 2007."

The new bankruptcy law also appears to allow for companies to reorganize themselves -- perhaps similar to U.S. style Chapter 11:

Another key provision in the new law introduces a mechanism for corporate reorganizations that could allow some troubled companies to avoid bankruptcy, said An Jian, vice chairman of the standing committee's legislative-affairs committee. "This will help to avoid social ramifications as a result of liquidation such as unemployment and loss of social wealth," Mr. An said at a news conference yesterday.

We will write more on these new laws as their enactment comes closer. 

Comments (8)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Mark Anthony Jones - August 28, 2006 9:09 PM

This is somewhat off topic I know, but I'm wondering what the China Law Blog's overall assessment is of China's legal system. I know, having read through this site, that you are optimistic about China's potential to manage its many serious environmental problems, and I have quoted from this blog when debating with Sojourner on the nature and China's governance and society, where we have touched on environemtnal issues. (see the MAJ-Sojourner Debate on my site) We are also discussing China's "rule of law", though I must confess to not really knowing very much at all about this area of study.

Is China making good progress toward the establishment of the "rule of law"? In what areas of law has China made good progress (if any) and what are the present day weaknesses in their system?

And what is your prediction for the future? Are you optimisitc?

I would really appreciate the provision of a general overview, if you have time to post such a thread on this site. It would certainly provide a valuable reference.

Cheers!

Steven - August 28, 2006 9:53 PM

Shanghai Municipal government issued "2006 white paper on environment for foreign investment" and "2006 Shanghai Investment Guide Map" this month. Also a significant event which shows the development of FDI in Shanghai.

For detail information please check my blog: blogant.igotfree.com.

China Law Blog - August 29, 2006 12:14 AM

Steven --

Are you in Shanghai? Do you get the sense Shanghai is becoming any less interested in FDI than before?

China Law Blog - August 29, 2006 12:19 AM

Mr. Jones --

Thanks for checking in and thanks for the always lively MAJ-Sojourner Debate. Your timing is good as I just tonight got an e-mail from the field (our summer associate is in Qingdao) in which he vehemently defends a Chinese court (and hence the Chinese courts in general) as being quite good.

However, one very clear proviso must be made. The court he is defending is a business court and the cases on which we write are business cases. On that front, without a doubt, China is slowly but surely moving ever closer to the Rule of Law.

I have no personal knowledge (and no real expertise either) with respect to Chinese court's handling of what we in the West would call political or civil rights cases, but my sense from my readings on that is that things are not getting any better and, may in fact be getting worse.

We will be running the summer associate post on the courts within the next few days.

Mark Anthony Jones - August 30, 2006 8:09 PM

Dear China Law Blog,

Thanks most sincerely for your reply. I appreciate your fair assessment - so progress has and is being made where business law is concerned, but where civil law is concerned, China may presently be experiencing a "wave of regression". Thanks - your assessment will no doubt be quoted at some point over the next few weeks on the MAJ-Sojourner Debate. Sojourner is currently working on his response to my last post, and it should appear sometime late next week.

I look forward to reading your summer associate post on the courts when it appears. This site really is a very useful resource.

China Law Blog - August 30, 2006 8:44 PM

Mr. Jones --

As I get older, I realize more and more that old adages become old adages because they are true. In this case, I am thinking of the one on how flattery will get you everywhere. Thanks. I will be running the summer associate's post in a few hours.

Steven - September 4, 2006 2:07 AM

Steven --

Are you in Shanghai? Do you get the sense Shanghai is becoming any less interested in FDI than before?

Sorry for the late reply. I subscribed your blog via email, without noticing that you replied my comments a week ago.

Well, I am a Shanghainese. Regarding the FDI in Shanghai, I noticed that recently the municipal government is changing its policy from attracting FDI to attracting specific FDI. For example, in several districts, "Third category Industry" (mainly including service providers) is encouraged by local governments. If you are interesting in this field, I may follow up with a brief analysis on my blog.(www.igotfree.com/blogant)

China Law Blog - September 4, 2006 5:28 AM

Steven --

Thanks for checking back in. I too am seeing this occuring. If you are in a high pollution business, Shanghai hardly wants you, but if you are in a service business, or even better yet, a high tech business, Shanghai will be all over you. I would, of course, love to see you do something on this on your blog.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is