The Chinese Are Coming, Part XII -- But You Should At Least Ask
We are always posting on how Chinese outbound investment is growing and will continue to grow. This is, after all, part 12.
For the last year or so, the Chinese government has been increasingly talking about ramping up outbound foreign investment and Chinese companies have increasingly been doing just that. The government recognizes few Chinese companies have the skills required to be true global players and that acquiring foreign assets and operating overseas will hasten the learning curve, just as it did for Japanese companies in the 80's and Korean companies in the 90's. It also makes for good world politics.
The strenghtening Yuan will only accelerate this trend as it reduces the Yuan price of Chinese overseas purchases and investments.
My Seattle based investment banker friend who is always calling me with ideas for China purchases called me again this week to say he thought Eddie Bauer (which is on the block) would be perfect for a Chinese company. I think he is right.
John Ray, another investment professional, agrees the Chinese are coming and he is also of the view that Americans should be out there marketing for it. Mr. Ray heads up an Atlanta based corporate advisory company, Heritage Capital Advisors, "focused on those sectors we know, while shunning what we haven't a clue about." Mr. Ray wrote an opinion piece for the Atlanta Busines Chronicle calling on his home state of Georgia to increase its marketing to bring Chinese companies in. Mr. Ray's editorial is entitled "It's Time to Ask for the Business---in Chinese," and it can also be found on his company's Heritage Tidbits Blog.
Mr. Ray equates China outbound investment today to that of Japan in 1979 and he calls for the state of Georgia to aggressively court Chinese inbound investment just as the more aggressive states courted Japanese investment back then:
In 1979, President Jimmy Carter told a meeting of the nation's governors to go to Japan and persuade the Japanese "to make in the U.S. what they already sell in the U.S." In other words, "Go ask for the business."
Lamar Alexander, then the newly elected governor of Tennessee, went to Japan, selling the advantages of locating manufacturing facilities in Tennessee. By doing so he followed the example of Georgia Gov. George Busbee, who had helped formed the Japan-Southeast U.S. Association a few years earlier.
Nissan became convinced of those rewards, one of which was to bypass the rising protectionist backlash against Japanese imports. In February 1981, the company broke ground in Tennessee on a $300 million truck plant originally slated to employ 1,300. This plant was just the first trickle in a Japanese investment tidal wave. In Tennessee alone, approximately 160 Japanese-owned facilities now employ roughly 42,000 people, representing an investment of more than $10 billion.
Today's hottest global growth story, of course, is China. Seemingly the only thing growing faster than China's economy is the ambition of its entrepreneurs. I have yet to visit China without encountering multiple entrepreneurs seeking to expand to the United States. Many of these businessmen already understand that becoming a major employer of U.S. workers in U.S.-based facilities is an effective way to crack the world's most important market.
With protectionist sentiment in the United States now focused on China, Chinese entrepreneurs and economic development officials are scouring this country; ambitious and knowledgeable Chinese businessmen are visiting Southeastern states while being courted by officials from those states on their own trips to China.
What Mr. Ray says about Georgia can be said of nearly the entire United States and countless other countries as well. China is engaged in massive outbound investment efforts right now and though it will take more than just asking for that business, those who ask are more likely to receive.
For those interested in reading more on Chinese outbound investments click here and here.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.chinalawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1256
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Chinese Are Coming, Part XII -- But You Should At Least Ask:


Comments
Dan, I've generally been in agreement with the idea that Chinese outbound investment in American business will increase. However, with only a few exceptions, such as ViewSonic, etc., Chinese (mainland, Taiwanese, Hong Kong) haven't really been able to create value-added brands that capture the attention of the US market. Even Haier is struggling to do so after 10+ years at it, instead concentrating on price and the low end. Low price and adequate quality are almost always the only message communicated successfully to overseas buyers.
With respect, an Eddie Bauer purchase isn't a fit with most Chinese buying candidates -- don't think any at this stage could deal with managing the marketing message nor with the company's exemplary customer service or even with the issue of managing American employees in large numbers.
Instead, for Chinese investors in the US, my recommendation is to stay under the radar with tactical moves, such as with purchases into established distribution channels (which scenario has happened rather more than a few times already) for product they are manufacturing and selling into the retail.
Sincerely,
Rich Kuslan
Editor, Asia Business Intelligence
www.asiabizblog.com
Posted by: Rich Kuslan | June 4, 2006 9:45 AM
Rich --
Thanks for checking in. I completely agree that the Chinese have so far been generally unable to create value-added brands. I also agree with your comment that "low price and adequate quality are almost always the only message communicated successfully to overseas buyers."
I also agree with you that the easiest purchases for Chinese investors in the US would be "purchases into established distribution channels for product they are manufacturing and selling."
However, I disagree with you regarding companies like Eddie Bauer because I think that Chinese companies must start venturing out, just as Lenovo and Huawei are doing. Now I fully realize that it would be fair to dexcribe both Lenovo's and Huawei's U.S. ventures as failures so far, but I also think it would be fair to describe them as learning experiences. If Chinese companies are going to become global players, they are going to need to take some risks and sustain some losses.
You are absolutely right to assert there are no Chinese companies with the marketing and retail expertise to run a company like Eddie Bauer, but there very well may be a Chinese company with sufficient managerial expertise to take on an Eddie Bauer and oversee its U.S. operations while retaining most of its management, much as Lenovo has done with IBM. China makes clothes cheaply. Eddie Bauer is still a strong name. Those two things make China and Eddie Bauer a good fit, but I agree the wild card is management capability.
Posted by: China Law Blog | June 4, 2006 10:24 AM
I should have mentioned that Haier tried to acquire Maytag last year and is presently rumored to be fairly close to a deal to acquire Korean's Trigem company.
Posted by: China Law Blog | June 4, 2006 3:23 PM
Now I fully realize that it would be fair to dexcribe both Lenovo's and Huawei's U.S. ventures as failures so far, but I also think it would be fair to describe them as learning experiences.
------------------------
I agree with the above comments. TCL's acquisition of Thomson can also be put into the category of "failure." However, these present 'failures' are paving the way for future success. SO, yes, the Chinese are coming.
Posted by: Hang | June 4, 2006 11:30 PM
Hang --
Thanks for checking in. I concur. I agree TCL/Thomson should be added to the list. And how many non-Chinese mergers/buyouts are instant successes? HP/Compaq?
Posted by: China Law Blog | June 5, 2006 6:35 AM
Dan,
Thanks for referencing my recent editorial. You should know that we have received one recent answer in Georgia to "asking for the order" in Chinese:
I enjoy your blog very much; keep up the great work!
Best regards,
John
Posted by: John Ray | June 29, 2006 5:56 PM
John --
Thanks for checking in. Flattery is ALWAYS appreciated. Thanks also for referring us to your newest post on this issue.
Posted by: China Law Blog | June 29, 2006 7:14 PM