Foreign Businesses In China -- Profitibility Is Both Easy And Hard
Two somewhat contradictory posts on yesterday's blogosphere on the ease of doing business in China.
The relatively new Going Global Blog, written by Craig Maginness, an international trade consultant, just did a post entitled, "Walking the Tightrope to Profitability in China -- Must We Work Without a Net?" discussing the difficulties foreign businesses have in turning a profit in China.
The post sees foreigners doing business in China as feeling as though they are Chinese acrobats performing without nets. Maginness talks about being "struck over and over again about conversations with business people who are pumped about the opportunities in China but who have lost money pursuing them." He asks, with so much growth and abounding economic opportunity, how can so many companies be losing money?
Manginnes then answers his question by talking about the "delicate" balancing acts that businesses must go through in China and proposes businesses prepare for this by increasing "the time and focus on the contingency portion of your plan for China."
I agree with the advice, but, based on both my own experiences and on what I read, I disagree with the facts he uses to get there. First off, the companies I know doing business in China are, almost without exception, doing quite well there. Those who manufacture in China (either on their own or through OEM) are, despite frequent quality control problems, making money by saving money and those who are in China to make money by selling goods or services are doing exactly that.
As much as I would like to assert that our clients thrive in China because of something we are doing as their lawyers, I know that is not the case. They are thriving in China because the kind of company that is savvy enough to retain Western lawyers with substantial China experience for their China business needs is the exact kind of company that is likely to thrive there.
The company that thinks it can send someone to China for a month or so, hire a great local manager for $300 a month and then leave will virtually never succeed. Those are also the companies that are unwilling to do things right on the legal side either.
In addition to my own small sample of thriving China companies, the statistics also indicate foreign businesses are thriving in China. As I previously noted in my post, "Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics and Making Lots of Money in China," a recent survey of American companies doing business in China indicated that two-thirds said they are profitable or very profitable in China, and 42% said their China margins were higher than their world-wide margins. These statistics are really quite amazing since there are definitely many companies in China expecting to lose money for years until they can build up their name or achieve economies of scale and because so many companies are relative newcomers.
The Chief Asia Inspector Blog just did a post that, at least in part, helps explain why foreign businesses are thriving in China. This post, entitled, "The Tale of Two Offices," discusses the ease and low cost of opening an office in China by comparing it to opening an office in France (my own personal favorite whipping boy country):
In one of these countries [France], thanks to red tape, the whole exercise took 10 months. In the other [China], once we decided where we wanted to be, it took 3 weeks. In Country A [France], we spent '120,000 on a 250 m2 space; in Country B [China], we spent '12,000 for a 350 m2 space .If you want to get all accountant about it: that's 40% more space in Country B [China] than Country A [France] for a tenth of the price, organized in only 7% of the time. Country B [China] practically delivered the office faster than it takes Country A [France] to deliver parcels.
Specifically, the Country B site is in Shenzhen's Special Economic Zone. My recent enthusiasm for Shenzhen becomes clear! We've tripled our staff there since the beginning of the year and the city has welcomed us with open arms.
For those who dismiss China as simply a source of cheap labor ' look again. It is such a relief to be here and not to have to gear up for a bureaucratic battle every time we try to use our entrepreneurial initiative.
China is, in many ways, a surprisingly easy country for foreign business, but not always. I like how one of our clients, a very successful transportation engineering company, in describing what it is like for his company to do business in China, said that it China surprises him with how loose it is in most aspects of doing business there, but yet it is also surprisingly tight in a few areas. My own view is that China is, overall, a relatively easy country for foreign companies, but the ease of doing business in China does vary depending on the type of business and its location.

Comments (6)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endJohnny - June 15, 2006 5:50 PM
It's true that the foreign wholly owned business will amass an enormous fortune in China, but the joint ventures present a totally different picture. As far as I am concerned, given the experience I used to be working in a joint venture with Japan in shanghai, the foreign side will normally acquire much more profits than the domestic side does, of which the reasons may vary from case to case. The probable and primary causes underlying this phenomenon are to be attributed to as follows: the domestic side�s work mainly concerns with the so called nationalization-small modification of the products to be fit into the requirement and needs of the mainland market-that demands low technology and intelligence from Chinese counterpart, hence low value added work ensues. When it comes to the sale of the modified commodities, another retailing and trading company will be established with the foreign side holding 100% shares, which will funnels larger potion of the margins out of the total revenues to the foreign pocket, for the domestic side doesn�t have the rights or privileges to be involved in the managerial and executive actions.
China Law Blog - June 15, 2006 7:03 PM
Johnny --
Thanks for checking in. It's interesting that you should say that about foreign companies also doing well in Chinese joint ventures because that has not been my experience. Foreign companies in Chinese joint ventures oftentimes end up having problems and end up terminating the jv at a loss. I think this is far less true with the big joint ventures and maybe that is what you are referring to, but the smaller companies often suffer in them and I am of the view that if a foreign company can go into China as a Wholly Foreign Owned Entity (WFOE), it should.
Johnny - June 15, 2006 7:59 PM
Absolutely right. Nowdays mostly all the foreign investors are prone to register their business in China as WFOE rather than JV if circumstances permitting.Actally it has become prevailing and commonplace as China stepps up its reform & opening up policy as well as fullfilling the WTO membership obligation.
China Law Blog - June 15, 2006 9:18 PM
Johnny --
Yes.
Craig Maginness - June 20, 2006 5:38 PM
Dan--
Thanks for the reference to my post -- but I'm not sure we disagree on either the substantive issue here or the facts. I do think you may have misconstrued the point of my post -- so allow me to clarify a few things.
I too know of many businesses doing very well in China -- I'd like to think some of it has to do with following guidance on sound planning. But the fact is, and your own statistics bear this out, that many companies are not doing so well.
You cite that two thirds of U.S. companies in a recent survey reported being profitable or very profitable. That of course means that 1 in 3 are not profitable -- which seems to me to be a substantial downside worthy of some serious contingency planning, which was my point in the first place.
I might add that this kind of experience is fairly uniform among foreign companies doing business in China. In a recent survey of EU companies doing business in China, 61% expected to be profitable this year -- again over 1 in 3 apparently expected not to be profitable. Even Taiwanewse companies, which one might think would have some advantages, struggle -- as of some information released by the government in Taipei 2 years ago, only 40% of Taiwanese companies reported that their business on the mainland was profitable.
Finally, I think there is a differnce between companies that have been on the ground for some time and those that are still learning as they go. In a survey released by the GAO on the impact of China's membership in the WTO, 72% of U.S. companies that had been in China for 6 to 20 years reported being profitable -- but that number dropped to 43% when limited to companies that had been in China for 5 or fewer years.
In sum, I couldn't agree more that there is lot's of money to be made in China and a lot of companies are doing very well making that money. But unless one wants to be pollyanna about it, which I don't think is ever a good business strategy, that doesn't refute the fact that a significant number (and for this purpose I would consider anything above 20 or 25 percent to be significant) are struggling to achieve profitablility. My point was (and I apologize if the acrobat analogy was not apt) that in the face of this issue, it is neither necessary nor prudent to proceed without the additional degree of safety that adequare attention to contingency planning can provide.
China Law Blog - June 20, 2006 5:59 PM
Craig --
Now that you put it that way, we don't disagree on anything. I just considered the statistics in a more positive light than you did, but no matter what the statistics say or how they are interpreted, I agree that contingency planning makes sense.